site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 9, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If Iran has the ability to "destroy the global economy" whenever they want then this conflict was coming sooner or later because the rest of the world actually can't afford to cede that power to a rogue state. It's actually the most rational war in the world.

a strategy which won't harm them terribly much due to their continued ability to sell oil to China

No no no you're not understanding how war works. War is not America plays pretend. If there's an oil pipeline somewhere that allows Iran to hold out forever -- America will bomb it! Iran can't stop us. America will simply destroy Iran. The only reason America hasn't done that already is our charity. We want Iran to be able to pick up the pieces after they surrender and the war is over. But if the Iranians are delusional or fanatical enough to hold out we will simply end their capacity to function like a modern state. If the only two alternatives are "Iran wrecks the Global Economy" or "The Global Economy wrecks Iran," which do we think Donald Trump is picking?

By your logic it seems Trump is picking 'Islamize all your allies through mass refugee crises'. Which is the result of pretending that after the war ends, everyone just goes back home. America is doing a lot worse than pretend.

Any putative Iranian refugees have to pass through many safe countries before reaching Europe. If European countries want to destroy themselves we really can’t stop them.

You could stop bombing them where they live, for starters. That would stop them.

I was recently working with a Palestinian who had walked from Turkey to Austria, applied to refugee status, got rejected by all except one country and voila, now there is a family of 8 living in my town. Why did he spend 2 years away from his family, walking across Europe? He showed me pictures of his old house, and then again when it was just a pile of rubble on the ground. Then how the conditions in the camp in Turkey were shit. It was no place for raising a family. So he sought a better life.

What is the option for Europe here? Kill them all? Let them starve on the border? Create a humanitarian crisis in Jordan and Turkey? The situation is completely ridiculous. If Iran doesn't withstand this, we will be seeing a refugee crisis that will dwarf everything else.

Hell, no matter what, in less than 100 years we can expect a sizeable enough muslim majority in Britain to take relevant political control.

Honestly, I can't take your rhetoric seriously. If Europe wants to destroy themselves? The cold hard American realist can apparently just scoff. As if a Muslim majority country with fully functional nuclear submarines that can launch strikes anywhere in the world is a neutral development.

What is the option for Europe here? Kill them all? Let them starve on the border? Create a humanitarian crisis in Jordan and Turkey?

Complaining about your own weakness as you blame America what else do you want me to say? You don’t have the heart to kick them out, you don’t have the heart to keep the from coming in, you don’t have the heart to build your own military and stop America from getting involved. (Which we do on your behalf now that we produce all our own oil.)

Look I say this with love for Europe but it’s actually not all America’s fault here. However much blame you want to give us you are a continent of sovereign peoples, some of this is actually your fault

This rhetoric of asserting I am Europe and that you are America is beyond juvenile.

I asked you a question. What is the option for Europe regarding the refugees of the wars America is engaging in on behalf of Israel? Kill them all? Let them starve on the border? Create a humanitarian crisis in Jordan and Turkey? What should they do.

Who in Europe asked America to get involved in Iran? As if there aren't enough problems with energy over there. America is in Iran because of Israel. Rubio openly said so.

Look I say this with love for Europe but it’s actually not all America’s fault here. However much blame you want to give us you are a continent of sovereign peoples, some of this is actually your fault

Some of what? What is the think that you are talking about here?