This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The amount of time or "sexual humiliation" doesn't necessarily matter that much. Again, people throw out words like slut and whore casually as insults already. "You're a fucking whore slut who'd sleep with anyone" said for an hour over and over again as an insult would still likely not cross the bar from insulting a person to defamation. In fact we can look at another case of diss raps where the accusations was even worse with Kendrick vs Drake, pedophile and sex rings, and the defamation case fell through there too.
One big question is would reasonable people actually take this as serious allegations? Just like Kendrick v Drake, music is an art and the average listener does not listen to diss tracks expecting thoughtful well researched factual news. Putting a claim in a diss track vs presenting it as serious fact can make a significant difference in a defamation case, because the context it exists in takes away from how serious a reasonable person would take the claim. People generally understand songs are not meant as expressions of truthful information.
It depends on the exact circumstances of how you do it, but most likely not. Defamation cases succeeding in the US are not that common, it's a very high bar. It's especially high when criticizing authority figures, so there is a possibility that it might apply to the barista but not to say, a cop or the town's mayor. But even without that, I would not be surprised at all to find a defamation case from the barista fall through in similar circumstances as again, the medium of music, especially diss tracks, is not generally taken by the average person as intended factual information to begin with.
One casual check we could do is to ask if anyone in her life actually believed she was secretly a lesbian going around licking pussies thanks to the song? Not in a "did they tease her about the song" way, but in an actual belief way. Doesn't seem like there is if she didn't present any.
More options
Context Copy link