This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Where you lose me is "these police officers did something wrong, therefore it is justified to make a 15 minute video where you hire a stripper to portray one of them engaging in a bunch of sex acts." It doesn't follow. The officer can have done something wrong without deserving to be defamed.
There is no legal recourse against them, therefore complaints about recourses actually possible against them amount to wanting them to be immune to all consequences.
Police officers can and do get charged and convicted of crimes committed on duty, and police departments can and do get sued and pay out for civil rights violations committed by officers. It is outright false that there is "no legal recourse against them." Any issues that you have with whether a specific act by a police officer is a crime or civil rights violation should be taken to your legislature.
The problem with justifying extrajudicial vengeance against police officers as the means of tackling this issue is that if the behavior by the officers is legal, then only people with the celebrity status to streisand-effect the incident actually have the power to do anything about it. You haven't actually changed the legal situation, all you're doing is socially destroying the few random police officers who happen to do a search warrant on a celebrity with the social power to destroy them. The best possible result of this is that celebrities become effectively exempt from search warrants, but nobody else.
And sometimes when you flip a coin 100 times, it lands on edge every time.
Thank you, Marie Antoinette.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link