The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
No bio...
User ID: 174
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
20hr ago
If you're a cop, you can beat up people in tech, doctors, lawyers, academia, judges, and well, pretty much anyone else with impunity. Maybe not politicians. You may not have the prestige of a top doctor, but you have deference from the legal system and respect from the community. This is certainly more than enough to support being required to actually do your job when it involves the sort of things that would actually justify that respect.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
20hr ago
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
21hr ago
Cops in most places (almost certainly including Uvalde) get shitloads of "additional respect". Uvalde ain't Minneapolis or San Francisco or Portland or Seattle.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
21hr ago
Yes. The "U" part of UBI is load-bearing. It is at the least extremely difficult to test it validly. Fake WMATA jobs, however, do not even come close.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
21hr ago
I don't think that's correct. I don't see where it says it's limited to the police.
Because you didn't bother to look even after having it pointed it out. 609.065 refers back to 609.06, which is all about the police.
The offence is not fleeing the police. The offence would be hitting him with her car.
609.065 would cover the fleeing. The fleeing was an "offense which the actor reasonably believes exposes the actor or another to great bodily harm or death".
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
21hr ago
And that's without accounting for circuity -- that is, a bus takes a lot more miles to get a given passenger from point A to point B than a car does.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
21hr ago
No, Americans do like to live in cities like all settled peoples. Americans invented the skyscraper!
They're supposed to be offices, not residences.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
21hr ago
"Americans" are not a homogenous group with uniform preferences about urban living
If RandomRanger can generalize, so can I.
Americans living in suburbia is not a revealed preference because urbanism is mostly illegal - both in the sense that it is literally illegal to build at density in most of the US, and also in the sense that the system will not allow you to do the things you need to police somewhere built at urban densities
For the past few decades the anti-sprawl people have been encouraging density and eliminating new suburban growth. And certainly density was not banned when the post-WWII suburbs were being built.
And yes, the system will not allow the kind of authoritarian policing that Japan has to maintain civility with that sort of density. That's not making urbanism illegal. That's just showing that Americans aren't yet comfortable with such authoritarianism.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
21hr ago
One can simply disconnect political power from the people who would vote themselves more largesse from the treasury, through cens or some other mechanism, and vast amounts of good governance suddenly becomes very possible.
While we're at it, can we get angels in the form of kings to govern us?
Certainly an aristocracy of benevolent and competent people could do this. These aristocracies are rare in history and fleeting at best.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
22hr ago
I wonder how gun control advocates have responded to the fact that police have no obligation to protect anyone, if they have even addressed that at all.
Mostly they ignore it. Warren v. DC comes up all the time in online Second Amendment discussions, but since the anti-gunners and the mainstream media are on the same side, they don't have to address it in public.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
22hr ago
I disagree only in that I think rights do not come with responsibilities (and saying they do is a common way of vitiating rights, "You have the right to do X, you have the responsibility to only do X the way we say"), but privileges do -- and what the police have as a result of being police is the latter.
You want be a cop, you can't use "the criminals might shoot me" as a reason not to do your job in any given instance. You signed up for that.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
The point would not be to win, it generally rarely is with nuclear war.
The US won the first one.
And yes, MAD is supposed to work as you say. But a sane US leader isn't going to attempt to take over Canada, and a deranged one isn't going to care.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
Americans don't like to live in anthills where public transit can theoretically be efficient. That's not a failing of Americans.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
Public transport should be more systemically efficient (1 engine for 40 rather than 40 engines for 40: economies of scale)
It isn't, though. Because it turns out average number of riders on a bus is not 40 but 9.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
If the measurement is supposed to be 56 1/2", and you measure it and it turns out to be 56 17/32", and then the next time you measure it it's 56 19/32", and then 56 21/32", then you'll now note that 56 21/32" is more than 1/8" from the nominal 56 1/2", and you'll record that. It's only if
-
You DO record the measurement each time and
-
You compare against the previous measurement, not the nominal correct value
that creep will get you.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
The man is a raging narcissist, if you take him at his word that "he'll come to our rescue 100%", when he started all this by writing "[he] no longer thinks only of peace" because "we" denied him the nobel peace prize, you are far gone.
You're complaining about what he says, and then when he says the opposite of the bad thing you're complaining about, you're substituting your own headcanon instead. This is not a valid complaint.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
When he says he doubts we will come to america's aid, insult aside, that means america possibly won't come to ours.
No, that is not what that means. In fact what he is quoted as saying was
"I know we'll come to [Nato's] rescue, but I just really do question whether or not they'll come to ours," he told reporters.
Which contradicts your interpretation quite explicitly.
If he attacks greenland or canada like he threatens, it's even simpler: we'll just shoot, and people will die - maybe even a real war like russia-ukraine.
Did he threaten? Or did he merely "not rule out" things. These are very different; the US has a long tradition of not ruling out things just because someone asks, and Trump knows that. He actually threatened tariffs.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
And the other is total complacency; as if ignoring trump's constant threats, insults, and outrageous declarations that one or both allies will not defend the other, was the only option for america's (at this point, nominal) allies, indefinitely.
You only have to wait out Trump. The sneering at America from the general direction of Europe isn't going to stop, ever. Yeah, you have to put up with Trump doing his Sam Kinneson act in your general direction for a while. In the overall scheme of things, it really is no big deal.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
That's not a natural law.
It's an accounting identity.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
They both claim to be on the right, and they're both idiots.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
One of the weird things about American politics is that "public transit advocates" have a hate-on for autonomous vehicles. This is despite the fact that AVs would allow running far more bus routes, more cheaply, than today.
Because public transit is a jobs and patronage program first and foremost.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
It makes me curious how much anti-urban living in the US is just a result of the high crime rates following the Great migration.
Rich people live in cities in the US too, and I think almost always have (though the ultra-rich will have multiple residences of course). The working class, middle class and UMC are the ones who moved out, and I believe this started immediately after WWII simply because of lack of housing (hence the building of the Levittowns and their follow-ons), but the high crime rates and the race riots probably accelerated the trend.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
No, they should just never elect commies in the first place. That will do better for them regardless of who the American president is.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
1d ago
The strategy could be: If you invade one of our cities, we will nuke a single city of similar size, thus turning the net outcome negative for you. If you retaliate proportionally, that will be the end of that round of aggression, otherwise we will respond proportionally (up to our stockpile size, naturally).
The whole idea of Canada engaging in nuclear deterrence against the United States is so absurd it must derive from some extremely advanced form of TDS/MAGA-derangement syndrome. But could it happen, you've put your finger on the fatal flaw: A US that deranged could win, because both the country and the stockpiles are larger. Take out Toronto and Ottawa, make a separate peace with Quebec, and annex the rest. The US could survive the losses of part of NY and DC.
No US leader (sane or otherwise) has attempted to take Greenland from Denmark by military force. Trump actually threatened nothing but tariffs. Not ruling out something is not the same as threatening it, and not ruling things out when asked is something that is both characteristic of Trump AND characteristic of the US (which, e.g., has never ruled out first use of nuclear weapons).
Certainly the US could take Canada, militarily. It's not going to happen under a sane leader. An insane leader could take Canada, militarily, even in the presence of a nuclear deterrent.
More options
Context Copy link