This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This was not happening, and this shows that this forum is really elite discussion forum not like any other. Nearly everyone here recognizes JCC as idealist devoted to cause of liberation of working class of the world, and his case as more tragic than comic.
Just few people argued that Marxist activism of JCC is just excuse to gain fame and sex, but these arguments fail flat.
250M is lots of money. With such cash, you could build replica of Nero's palace in all of its ancient glory (yea, in less prestigious location and not up to ancient craftsmanship standards), then fill it with harem of catgirls and catboys and livestream the orgies.
This way, you could become one of the most famous people of the world (and also undermine capitalism by several magnitudes more than anything JCC was doing).
But this is not what JCC wanted.
Thread is over, the time for grading is now.
And the winner is ... anyone who mentioned human capital.
Old time communists won over one third of humanity because they were Elite Human Capital of the time.
This is not the case any more, EHC lost interest long ago, modern self identified communists are rather sorry bunch.
Could this situation be reversed? Could Elite Communist Human Capital be rebuilt out of nothing? Probably not, this historical moment really passed for good.
More options
Context Copy link