This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I think this is not a very compelling thought experiment, because you clearly just took the present American dynamic about intelligence and imagined a world in which a completely analogous set of norms and hangups is in place involving height, without a believable story of how those dynamics would have developed over time or what internal logic makes them tick. Would height=morality world have gone through a phase where an elite of tall people was taken to have an unquestionable divine right to rule, with cautionary tales about the failures of countries where shorties called the shots? What sort of developments did it take for this phase to end? Height and intelligence are different in a great many other ways, like how your height is immediately apparent from afar, objectively measurable with little effort, doesn't change greatly based on environment or transient effects like substance consumption, and so on. Would this not make dissimulation about height much harder, and possibly (if the possible gains are sufficiently high) result in a development of a whole slew of social and physical technology to conceal height?
For a similar reason, I've been finding just about every "isekai where sociosexual behaviour of men and women is reversed" manga out there trite and disappointing. An allegory between things that are not actually similar, asking you to essentially imagine if the dissimilar thing were the same as your target subject in every way that matters for your argument but like its real self otherwise, does not add information for those who don't already agree with you - "imagine if actually pedophilia were legal and having sex with over-16s were illegal and taboo" "imagine if actually Crowleyan magick were real, and science and technology accepted to be woo" "imagine if actually communist societies were rich and successful and capitalism discredited for not being able to provide for the people's basic needs" etc.
Height is like a woman's waist or breast size, immediately apparent to everyone who sees you, and so is everyone else's to a first approximation. A woman may be insecure about her breasts or think she's fat, but she'll mostly be able to figure out her ordinal ranking from those around her.
Intelligence is like a man's penis size, secret, impossible to really display, and the ordinal ranking is totally unknown. A man can worry about having a small dick regardless of whether he has one or not. A man can worry about being dumb whether he is smart or not. The effect of repeated exposure to those at the top percentile is left as an exercise for the reader.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link