This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
He seems like a motivated thinker.
The US backs Israel because Jews were 30-40% of US high-end intellectual power which also translated to having $$$, controlling probably more than half of Hollywood, and around 30-40% of US Nobel Prizes. Plus Evangelicals like Israel because of the Left Behind Series and some of their End Times beliefs. The Holocaust is a nice stated belief but we don’t go around protecting Gypsies or sending massive Aid to Vietnamn who the US sort of directly bombed. It’s simply the Jews are very powerful in the US.
Everything I’ve seen has most of the big Gulf States backing the war. Not sure where he’s getting his data.
The ME during the Gulf Wars was geopolitically vital to the US. Our economy ran on oil. We did not produce enough domestically. They were our gas station.
If he’s a neocon and complaining about “international law” then I can’t take him serious. Supposedly the CIA always thought the WMD proof was coming from an untrustworthy clown who would say anything if you wrote him a check. Is Trump not going to the UN any worse than Cheney lying to the UN and everyone who didn’t have security clearances to know the war aims were bogus?
More options
Context Copy link