This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Yes, probably, and this is as true of women as much as men.
Your post has its points, but you seem to be operating under the assumption that all girls are sort of latent beautiful princesses. And would that this were so. I'd suggest that you're missing (as many who suggest that women just have to sit around being beautiful, picking and choosing which man to allow in) is that arguably most women are simply not very physically attractive in a conventional sense. This is especially true once a girl gets older and no longer has the lithe thinness of the teenage years (but many do not even have that.)
Post youth, the unattractiveness could be because of life style choices (poor diet, sedentary lifestyle, tobacco and alcohol use) or simply genetics. And your later statement that some women may have been born without makeup is either poorly worded or bizarre. I'd suggest men who rail against the unfairness of it all keep this in the forefront of their mind: There are many, many unattractive women. And this when the shelf life for even exceptional female physical attractiveness is measured in years--decades only with a lot of care taken.
I write all this not as a condemnation or dismissal of women. I'm at the age when physical beauty of random women near my own age is almost a non issue. Investing emotionally in one woman (who becomes your wife and the mother of your children) involves reconceptualizing what beauty means.
My final point is one that you seem to be making yourself: Men's worth is not necessarily tied up in how they look, and they are then capable of doing something about it. As WC Fields (or whoever) said to the woman accusing him of being drunk: "Tomorrow I'll be sober but you'll still be ugly."
Obligatory edit: My tastes are certainly not the tastes of many. One man's plain girl is another man's beauty, etc. well as it should be. My larger point is that life isn't all roses for all girls everywhere just because a few young attractive women have a high profile and many followers / orbiters.
Ok, i wouldnt say all women, i think an overall baseline attractiveness is there, at least initially. But i probably edit this post to incorporate some of these critiques. You (and others) do make a good point here.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link