This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
It means to move closer to the center in the left/right dichotomy.
Centrists have political beliefs. You are trying to cast apolitical people, aka people who just call themselves "apolitical" as "centrists" but I have never heard a centrist describe themselves as apolitical. They always express beliefs that are in the middle of the left vs right spectrum.
EA is dumb, they might portray themselves as "high IQ" but they are "low EQ" naive, idiots. They've just psy-opped themselves into these weird, niche, radical beliefs.
There is an interesting problem in your argument. You "hate" centrists because they lack beliefs or are dumb, but now you are calling them "normal" (opposite of weird), "apolitical", "even-kneeled". You've essentially gone from shitting on them to now glazing them. Word's do have meaning, so stop using the word "hate" to describe that anger you feel that they aren't weird like you. The desperate desire for them to adopt your weirdness.
Agree. It means moving closer to the center. That is what I have been saying a centrists is. It’s defined as being between Democrats and Republicans and lacking core beliefs.
You specifically said you don’t view yourself on the Dem-GOP axis which has been my point.
You say centrists have political beliefs. What are they? The meaning of the word “centrists” is between the gop and Democrat positions. Today it would be a neoliberal like Bill Clinton in the ‘90s. But if the gop or Dems move right or left Bill Clinton would no longer be a centrists. This is why I say centrists have no core beliefs because the definition of centrists changes as the right or left move.
EA are obviously high IQ. They have some dumb beliefs but the average member is 1 standard deviation above average. Before EA got popular the average EA was probably 2.5-3 standard deviations above average.
For the record I don’t define myself as right or left. In America I am MAGA because I think it’s best for America. If the US was still an Anglo nation I would be a libertarian. In most of LATAM I would be a fascists because they have huge low IQ populations. In Russia a militaristic authoritarian because of how hard the country is to defend.
I say centrists isn’t a definition because you need actual beliefs - what’s the abortion position? The optimum tax rate etc. Centrists is only defined by what the others are doing.
You later updated to radical centrisms. I think that’s a Reddit term when I’ve come across it so it has very little meaning in the vernacular outside of Reddit. Your political beliefs should have actual definitions. If you lack that then yes I would call you just apolitical.
Most political beliefs don’t fit neatly in one party. Catholic libertarians always vote GOP like Paul Ryan but he’s not purely right. Bernie Sanders isn’t a true leftists in American context. He’s left of the neolibs on social spending but traditionally has been far right on immigration (changed lately).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link