This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
That's a lie. Here's your full post in all its glory:
There is NOTHING in here about Iran funding Hezbollah.
But your lie is even worse than that, because next you evaded my question and then misrepresented it.
Here's what I asked:
In response, you admitted that Iran has been funding Hezbollah but ignored the question of whether Iran has been directing Hezbollah, and then tried to change the subject:
Nonsense. I simply asked you a reasonable question, one which you evaded. Actually you evaded twice.
Once by dodging the question of whether Iran directs Hezbollah, and again by dodging the issue of whether Iran exports terrorism.
And it's obvious why you are being so evasive. Because you know perfectly well that (1) Iran does in fact export terrorism; and (2) the United States and Israel do not. To get around this problem, you are trying to draw a false equivalence. There must have been some time when either the United States or Israel or both gave support to some group which at some point engaged in some kind of terrorist act. So by (1) ignoring the fact that Iran directs Hezbollah; and (2) ignoring the fact that Iran specifically intends to export terrorism, you can pretend it's the same thing.
No, it's not obviously the case. What's far more likely is that Iran does not bully the US as it does with Israel because (1) America is much further away; (2) America does not have the same kind of hostile population on its borders which can be organized and recruited like Hezbollah; and (3) America is by far the world's most powerful country and bullies tend to choose weaker targets.
In any event, I do not engage with people who evade or misrepresent my position, something you have done both here and in another exchange. Accordingly, this discussion is concluded. Feel free to have the last word -- I will not be reading or responding.
Here is the paragraph of the post you replied to when you asked me about Hezbollah and Iran:
So you're just not saying the correct thing here when falsely accusing me of lying.
Iran funds Hezbollah, even directs them when they need something done. They probably have more than a few Iranian soldiers in there was well. My entire argumentation assumed this was the case so I'm surprised.
But regardless of that, I repeatedly asked for clarification on this. If you felt that something relevant was lost in translation you could have clarified it. But you did not do that.
The US and Israel have exported terrorism continuously in the middle east. Israel does it directly via their own military actions against civilians, along with the US. But they have also funded armed forces on the ground directly. Most recently by hoping to arm Kurds to do the fighting for them in Iran. But most notably through funding Wahhabist ideology. Which is directly tied to some of the worst terror attacks outside the middle east.
I'm sure that factors in a lot. How this supposedly demonstrates that my point that 'Death to Israel' and 'Death to America' don't mean the same thing to Iran eludes me.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link