This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Well since you aren't on the unemployment/UBI queue yet, it follows that AI can't do your job. AI is pretty bad at using interfaces designed for humans.
But the hard part has already been done. I can prompt out a shader-evolution program, it basically evolves, based on human ratings of who propagates, generations of graphical animations, patterns of energy that would make pretty screensavers, save the ones I like to a folder.
That's easy, a couple of prompts.
Or I can have it write out fun skits, like the Iran/Hormuz situation mashed up with the "Ship Front fell off" skit: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3m5qxZm_JqM
The raw intelligence is there, there are just certain fiddly parts and a level of precision that's missing. A skit doesn't necessarily need to be precise, if code doesn't work right you can just tell it what went wrong and have it improve. Whereas with sending payment documents to people, precision is quite important.
I use it for work too, mildly superhuman proofreading and some other tedious document processing tasks, some of which need a certain level of judgement and wisdom. Precision is pretty good. But for these I have to use my custom scripts for that specific hours-long task, scripts that I've tried and tested over some time. And they really need to be more 'document input, document output' tasks rather than 'messing around with portals and niche software'.
But that's now, they're working on making agents reliable and cost effective. Eventually they'll get there. I can't understand a scenario where it's possible to create fairly complicated pieces of custom code with AI but logging into outlook, sending emails, logging into whatever govt portal, getting a 2FA code... is some domain reserved for humans alone. In the long term either AI has to be dumb as a rock/incapable of anything but specialized tasks like chess/go or it can be general purpose, doing anything a human can do.
More options
Context Copy link