This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Fuentes gets fedjacketed because he’s quite possibly the only person who entered the capitol grounds on Jan 6 who didn’t get arrested. Also he was arranging AFPAC during the Biden administration which basically gives Antifa types carte blanche to dox groypers by advertising public events.
Nearly every single charge was for people who entered the Capitol itself or restricted areas directly around the building, he did not get close to the building.
Also I forgot Fuentes is also buddy buddy with SPLC types like Hannah Gais… kinda interesting isn’t it?
Guy who:
might not be a FED but he certainly isn’t hurting left-wingers.
I like the idea that the SPLC is in cahoots with BAP but Fuentes praising Hannah Gais’ work must be him being naive or something… poor lil Nicky… always in such compromising positions!
He was investigated and subpoenaed in front of Congress.
"Organizing public events" makes you a fed, how does that make sense? He's trying to engage in politics under really difficult circumstances.
How is Fuentes "in the good graces of the SPLC"? Do you just say stuff with no evidence whatsoever?
Nick Fuentes was also like 18 during Charlottesville and people still claim he was paid by the SPLC, is this an op or something? Do people making these claims seriously believe them? I seriously doubt BAP etc. actually believes it, just spreading disinfo to help the SPLC's mission.
Organizing AFPAC publicly so your followers can get doxxed (except without your superchat income) is at best irresponsible but at worst a good way to help Antifa. This, if I recall, was the source of Fuentes’ enmity with BAP because BAP said it was a bad idea to host public events.
Lots of people get subpoenaed - again was there a single other person who urged their followers to break into the Capitol and entered the Capitol grounds who wasn’t arrested?
Who said anything about Nick at Charlottesville - there’s been 7 years in the interim.
Hannah Gais:
https://x.com/hannahgais/status/1773741238291689497
Michael Dyson:
https://x.com/mantonmilitant/status/1974217829760045352
Fuentes praising Gais:
https://x.com/jadenpmcneil/status/1974198265588691027
The SPLC has been unrelentingly hostile to the BAPphere because it refuses to engage in the WN 1.0 and cargo cult tactics like hosting public political conferences which might allow the Left to ruin the lives of the participants.
In addition, Fuentes can be counted on to dox anyone who works with him… he’s an absolute value to the Left.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Of those who were not charged how many have videos of themselves at the event telling other people, directly, to enter the building?
Nobody was charged under similar circumstances, Fuente's circumstances are different from everyone who was charged. If he went into the building and didn't get charged, ok suspicious, but people saying he is a fed because he wasn't charged like everyone else who stayed away from the building is absurd.
Do you have any examples of people in cricumstances similar to those of Fuentes?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link