This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
It was certainly portrayed that way, but it struck me as pretty horrific. They have an entire small town boarded off with all sorts of amenities, and they can't seem to share it with anyone. Even if you don't want to share, that's the perfect setup to get something good done--maybe man a radio tower, do some research into the disease, synthesize insulin, etc. Anyone who hangs up their coat at that point and says "I've done enough" is neglecting their duties towards humanity.
It was pretty well-established that tons of other people were dying because settlements were failing. People trecking between QZ's (or whatever they were called) and most dying on the way, QZ's failing, and so on. In this world giving housing to someone is often saving their life.
Researching the disease was the most ambitious option I mentioned--there are plenty of easier ways to help people which these guys also did not attempt.
As for what a small town has, well, probably not any scientific materials, but it will have plenty that can be traded for those materials. Again IDK if that would lead anywhere but to just do nothing while millions die around you is utterly grotesque. At the very least use a few pebbles from your mountains of spare time to relay radio messages.
Sure, that's why I'm talking about it too. I'm not laying awake all night seething about what more Bill and Frank could have done for the world, just find it fun to talk about.
Yeah pretty much. IDK how many people he should let in, but more than 0 (or 1 if you count Bill/Frank, I forget which is which). Joel isn't doing much for people but he also doesn't have nearly as good of a setup.
No, but if you're good and you have a lot of time you can do it. This article about it is pretty interesting and probably why I brought up that possibility. My (layman) understanding is that the hard part is creating the initial strain is really tough and requires some gene editing, but once the strain is created you can produce insulin pretty easily forever. So maybe the first step would be to track down an existing insulin factory, then fund expeditions there to recover the strain or at least the equipment.
I just rewatched the first episode and it sounds like they have the radio thing covered anyways, so idk what they should have done, but given their absurd prosperity I think morally a bigger effort to help out is required.
You don't think charity is a moral obligation?
This train of thought is pretty much copenhagen interpretation of ethics, and I 100% against it. Whoever survives in the apocalypse can spend their days however they want.
I'd argue that it's the opposite. The copenhagen interpretation of ethics would be to say "You're not interacting with all these other people so you have no obligation towards them."
If you're saying this is copenhagen because their moral obligations have changed due to external factors beyond their control, idk what to tell you. That is simply the nature of morality--your moral obligations are dependent to an extent on external circumstances. Pulling a trigger is highly immoral in some circumstances and morally necessary in others.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link