Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 126
- 1
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Those of you who dabble in writing fiction, how do you keep your characters from derailing your plot? Or is just the sign that the original plot sucked?
Sometimes it's worth following where the characters go. That's easiest when it's a detour - often a big scene just needs a different setup, or to happen in a different order, or have just one character out of the room - but sometimes it means changing the crux of the story. It doesn't always make it better, and I have seen it make the work much less coherent, but it's worth at least considering.
That said, if this is for the one-handed novelette or some major climactic scene, though, that may not be what you're looking for. You don't want to switch out a big action, drama, or sex scene just because your characters are getting cold feet or wouldn't be that adventurous.
... but I'd point out that very few people are perfectly attached to their principles and character. Throw temptation: would they do it for money, or pussy (or dick), or status? Throw time pressure: would they do it because someone threw a grenade into the room and they reacted instinctively, or because they only had a half-second to say no? Throw their judgement into question: would they do it if drunk as a skunk, or enraged to the breaking point, or half-asleep, or bleeding? Throw their certainty in question: have their peers judge them for their principles, or the villain tell them persuasively why their principles don't work, or have a valued ally suffer from their unflinching behavior earlier.
Alternatively, it can be a good reason to explore why this one out-of-character moment exists. Why is your brave warrior is fleeing like a coward can make a whole movie. That's one of the more dangerous ones, because it can take over or change the themes of a work heavily if the reason is heavy, even if it has no impact on the plot, but it can be all the more valuable for it.
I see what you did there.
And thanks for the advice, I really appreciate it. It's a one-handed novella already, btw, sitting at 24411 words right now with at least eight more scenes left.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link