This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
In my post, I was disputing the claim that Israel has been belligerent against everyone in the region. That's what I quoted.
For what it may be worth, I don't dispute that Israel has nuclear weapons. As to whether they were illegally acquired, I do know that Israel is not a signatory to the non-proliferation treaty, although I wouldn't be shocked if Israel broke some specific country's law along the way.
I'm not sure what you mean by "12 days' war" Iran has been aggressively and incessantly waging war against Israel for decades. So I'm not sure I would say that Israel "started" that war. But if you want to ignore context and look at in isolation (and I know that Israel haters LOVE to examine Israel's behavior out of context) then yeah, I don't dispute that Israel started a bombing campaign against Iran in June 2025 as a surprise attack.
Anyway, before we go on, let me ask you the same questions I asked SS:
Generally speaking do you dislike Jewish people?
Do you assign blame/responsibility to Jewish people for any of the public policies in the West to which you object? For example, if you object to Social Justice, do you assign any blame/responsibility for Social Justice to the Jews?
Sorry, deleted my comment because I realised you were only responding to the belligerent claim, which is fair, my bad.
I think theres a distinction between the relations Israel and Iran had before and after both sessions of surprise aerial bombing. I guess my motte would be that both surprise attacks severely increased direct kinetic conflict, civilian suffering, and heightened tensions in and between both states, in a way that wasn't there on the days before both attacks.
wrt your two questions:
In general, I agree. But I would also note that when countries decide to go to war, it inevitably increases "direct kinetic conflict, civilian suffering, and heightened tensions" War sucks, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's unreasonable or unjust. And in fact, this situation is a good example. Iran has been making war against Israel for decades through proxies. At any time, Iran could have stopped and enjoyed the same sort of uneasy peace Israel has with places like Egypt and Jordan. But instead, Iran decided to pursue a FAFO strategy. It was totally reasonable for Israel to strike directly at the country which has been attacking Israel indirectly.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link