site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of May 4, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I’m not sure that follows. A romantic partner might commit murder because of the shame of being publically outed as being in a relationship with a trans gender person,

Might. Sure. And how often does it actually happen?

and honour killings of trans people by their family members do occur. This is more common in cultures that do not accept trans people, which is why victims tend to be non-white or non-western.

Where we conveniently have no statistics or even informal obsevrations to back or contradtict your claims with.

If transphobia becomes more widespread and accepted, it seems obvious that violence and discrimination will increase as a result.

Or the whole "trans" fad, the entire social contagion and online trend, just dies out altogether, and the violence and discrimination go away with it.

Where we conveniently have no statistics or even informal obsevrations to back or contradtict your claims with.

You don’t notice the common theme here?

One of the issues being raised in this thread is that white middle class trans activists are claiming to be at risk of violence and murder when the stats show the victims are overwhelmingly Black, Hispanic and Middle Eastern. I don’t think you can deny the latter?

Or the whole "trans" fad, the entire social contagion and online trend, just dies out altogether, and the violence and discrimination go away with it.

And why would it die out? It might return to pre-2000s levels if the online trend goes down, but short of a global catastrophe I don’t see why people would stop wanting to transition. It might even increase in popularity with future improvements in biomedical technology.

And why would it die out? It might return to pre-2000s levels if the online trend goes down, but short of a global catastrophe I don’t see why people would stop wanting to transition.

The societies that are actually amenable to the "trans" fad are in the process of replacing their traditionally tolerant peoples with significantly more socially conservative newcomers. The welfare systems that currently enable people to ruin their bodies and be propped up regardless are on track to collapse sooner or later. The sheer ridiculousness of "trans" will eventually overcome the already weakening social stigma on noticing. It won't be all too long before the guy putting on a dress and demanding to be called a woman's name will be laughed out of the room again.

"Trans" can only survive as long as its practitioners are able to ensconce themselves in online echo bubbles where positive reinforcement is mandatory.

Ironically people from socially conservative cultures are the least able to tell that someone is trans. I’ve posted about this here before, some male posters even said they were called “miss” by Middle Eastern men just for having long hair. It’s going to be easier to pass even if acceptance is decreased. Not sure that’s worth the cost due to the added risk if they found out, but eh.

It won't be all too long before the guy putting on a dress and demanding to be called a woman's name will be laughed out of the room again.

Good thing I wear jeans.

"Trans" can only survive as long as its practitioners are able to ensconce themselves in online echo bubbles where positive reinforcement is mandatory.

So how did trans people exist before the 90s? The few media portrayals weren’t exactly positive.

So how did trans people exist before the 90s? The few media portrayals weren’t exactly positive.

As a tiny fringe group in urban areas where eccentrics could network?

Ask instead how they existed before the 1900s.

It might return to pre-2000s levels if the online trend goes down

Bit of a wording quibble but I would count that as dying out; pre- and post-2000s transness seem like quite different phenomena with quite different motivations, even if they rhyme somewhat.