Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Who should I follow on X? I follow exactly zero people, and my feed is mostly low-quality culture war.
I want a high-quality feed, not necessarily CW, anything goes as long as I don't close the app feeling like I've just eaten at Hooters.
I follow A.Shipwright and one other artist, and my feed is filled with art (IMO only mediocre but I’m picky).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Someone rec me a good TL of the Illiad/Odyssey.
It's been a long time since I've read/studied it and I'm out of date. I at least dimly remember a lot of pushback from some better-read people than I about the Emily Wilson TL of the Odyssey.
I kind of want to read a passable translation again for posterity's sake due to some discussion and dissatisfaction I've noticed with the latest trailer for Nolan's attempt at Homer. Not in prose if possible, ideally the power and scope of the oral poetry should be preserved. Despite the power of the "Sing, O Muse, of the Rage of Achilles" line, many of the recommended or popular TLs I've seen have far shittier renditions of that verse.
More options
Context Copy link
Definitive editions with copious endnotes! Aren't they cool?
Sherlock Holmes: Oxford University Press (out of print)
d'Artagnan: Pleiades Library
Little House: Library of America
Example endnote:
Via Google Translate, with obvious liberties curtailed:
The evolution of my custom house's construction schedule:
2025-07-23: The contractor offers me a contract with tentative schedule extending from 2025-10-13 to 2026-01-13 (13 weeks). I clarify that such an early completion date is not convenient for me. (At the time, I plan to retire in 2027-02.)
2025-07-24: I sign a contract with tentative schedule extending from 2026-08-03 to 2026-10-03 (9 weeks).
2025-09: I am overwhelmed by depression, retire ASAP, and inform the contractor that I am ready to proceed with construction earlier than I said previously.
2025-12-16: I sign a contract with tentative schedule extending from 2026-03-30 to 2026-07-06 (14 weeks).
2026-02-17: Via email (not in a contract), the contractor gives me a tentative schedule extending from 2026-03-02 to 2026-05-06 (9 weeks).
2026-03-02: Construction starts.
2026-05-04: I make my weekly visit to the site, note that completion within the next two days seems impossible, and via email ask the contractor for a new tentative completion date.
2026-05-07: The "construction coordinator" informs me that both the "sales director" who gave me the date of 2026-05-06 and the project manager who has been overseeing the project no longer work at the contractor, and she will obtain a new tentative completion date soon.
This was this project's second project manager, too (replacing the one that I complained about previously). I don't know whether (1) the rats are fleeing the sinking ship, or (2) this churn is just a natural part of the renaming/restructuring/reshuffling that the contractor is going through (which started in 2025-11).
Photograph: Unpainted drywall; R-49 ceiling insulation
Interesting excerpt from the latest annual SEC filing of Opendoor, perennially-unprofitable startup number umpteen:
Net promoter score is calculated as follows:
To your customers, give a survey: "On a scale from 0 to 10, how likely is it that you would recommend this company to a friend or colleague?"
People who answer 10 or 9 are categorized as "promoters"; people who answer 8 or 7, "passives"; and people who answer 6 or lower, "detractors". (Insert complaint about rating inflation.)
Net promoter score is defined as promoters minus detractors (in percentage terms), and ranges from −100 to +100. According to popular survey administrator Qualtrics, 1 to 20 is "good", 21 to 50 is "favorable", 51 to 80 is "excellent", and 81 to 100 is "world-class". According to popular survey administrator SurveyMonkey, scores of 30 to 45 are average, and scores of 55 to 75 are in the top 25 percent of companies in a selection of popular industries.
Of course, this number is from Opendoor's SEC filing, so it probably is biased toward Opendoor. But 80 versus 30 is a pretty wide margin.
More options
Context Copy link