This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Facts that do not in the slightest contradict anyone's position do not meaningfully move the needle on those positions. They just definitionally do not. You're just incredulous at your own existence in kind of a lottery-brained way, running naked and free across the landscape telling us what alternate universes must or must not be like, all the while preemptively scolding everyone else that they shouldn't engage in any wild speculation.
I say lottery-brained because it's like someone wins the lottery, looks at how low their odds of winning were, and decides god is on their side. If the form of the universe isn't predetermined then of course whatever actually results will be in itself incredibly unlikely in direct proportion to the possibility space. If there are an infinite number of tickets then the odds of any individual slob winning are virtually zero, yet win someone must.
Then there's the fact that we don't even know how many drawings there have been. Since we're talking about the literally unfathomable depths of existence, let me sling a little bullshit too: What happens when the universe reaches its ultimate post heat death state, to the point that time ceases to be a meaningful concept? I kind of have an unjustifiable suspicion that everything just starts over in some form. For basically no reason, because quantum something fluctuation something and the fact that over an infinite amount of time any event with a greater probability than a total existential zero is guaranteed to occur.
Or maybe a magic man does it every time, while pixie dust sparkles and he strokes his beard. That doesn't actually help anything though, because even if it were the case, then I'd just want to know where the hell he came from and what was going on before that.
You're at this point arguing against a position I haven't taken.
I'd like to see you apply that reasoning consistently across the board. Every stone in the world is idiosyncratic in its shape, so coming across a perfect cube shouldn't give you pause. If you're playing poker with someone and they get royal flushes 10 turns in a row, there's no reason to suspect cheating, since it's about as probable as any other specific configuration. Any set of hands is unlikely, right? I suppose if you detect a radio signal from the heavens that appears to be sending out primes in sequential order, you should just shrug your shoulders and go on with your day, since it could also just be random noise. Right? There's nothing to explain.
Sure? Yes, the whole infinite-drawings explanation is indeed a possible solution. I'm atheist and don't think a magic man did it at all. I'm generally against jumping to conclusions on the issue; rather I'm saying there is something there which does appear to be strange, I reject assertions that there is nothing weird about the apparent fine-tuning, and note that there are a bunch of possible explanations virtually all of which can't be supported.
I don’t have nearly as much certainty as you’re imputing onto me. Perhaps model your opponent correctly first before trying to get into an argument with them.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link