Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 117
- 1
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Also:
Come on, you're exaggerating here.
Writing up an invitation to a housewarming party is not autistic at all! After writing this particular invitation, I actually asked my local decensored LLM to write up an example invitation to a housewarming party, and it looked more or less like what I had written (though obviously much less detailed, since it had no source material to work from). And this document is only two pages long—perfectly acceptable for an invitation. Maybe the digression about insulation in appendix C is slightly autistic, but energy efficiency is important for homeowners.
Enjoyment of designing houses is not autistic at all! Writing up a distillation of concepts in order to help others design their own houses is slightly autistic—but, again, this particular handout is only two pages long (if I adjust the margins), not a gigantic eight-page tome.
"Patient displays dimished insight into condition"
(That's a joke)
I would bet good money on you having Aspergers (or high functioning ASD, as we'd call it these days). This is mostly a gestalt clinical impression on the basis of significant familiarity/fond perplexity. It's not a formal diagnosis. I haven't had the pleasure of meeting you (I am sadly not invited to the party), which is the bare minimum for a formal diagnosis. Or actually, below the bare minimum, because the GMC would disbar me if that was my standard practice.
Man... Where would I even begin to answer that question? That's a serious statement.
A written house warming invite is perfectly fine. The specific format and terminology you've used is... unusual. Please note that I'm not assigning any negative connotations here at all. Never have. It's friendly riffing on the internet with a kernel of truth in it. It is abundantly clear that you are high-functioning and a productive member of society, even after retirement. You should probably get that depression properly checked out, if you haven't already. You clearly know where to find a PHQ-9 form.
To be clear, I don't think any degree of autism, by itself, can get a human being ITAR restricted. Nor do I actually believe you can manage to build a space elevator, at least not with a reasonable budget. Megastructural engineering is probably not your area of expertise as a civil engineer, but then again, you probably know the specs of elevator-planning, and what is a space elevator but a very, very tall elevator?
Okay. I'm burnt out on exam prep right now, so I will take a half-hearted crack at identifying supportive elements from the textual evidence provided:
The autism is that your housewarming invitation opens like a government form, proceeds by FAQ, and invokes 2024 International Fire Code 1004.5 to explain why invitees may bring one pet but no household members. You cite the occupant load factor for "assembly without fixed seats, unconcentrated (tables and chairs)," derives a 14-person cap, concedes the IFC isn't actually applicable to private residences, and then independently re-derives the same number from your floor plan geometry. Three justifications, in order, for the guest cap on a sixteen-person gathering.
A five-level wellness rubric with columns for Willpower, 24/7 headache, Enjoyment of life, and Rough time period, with your current 2-to-3-out-of-5 rating disclosed in a public appendix circulating to your former colleagues and your brother. I am genuinely glad you are not still at 1/5. Late 2025 sounds rough. Your coworkers from the retirement job, though, probably did not show up looking for a quarterly state-of-the-soul report. I mean, I can't rule that out either, maybe all civil engineers are like this?
Capitalized WILL in "Entry WILL be refused to anything beyond that," where "anything" rather than "anyone" is appropriate because pets are grammatically inanimate. The same all-caps treatment on "My plan for the future is to RELAX." Consistent signature style throughout. Your mother parenthetically identified as "the renter of a bedroom in the house" rather than as your mother, because... I genuinely don't know. I am the wrong flavor of neurodiverse for that.
I must reiterate: no negative connotation. I'm saying this with sincere affection and anthropological awe. You are clearly high-functioning, productive, technically competent, conscientious, and capable of producing documents that make normal people look like chimps poking at drywall with a stick. When you ask "what exactly about this is autistic?", you so while standing inside a two-page exhibit titled Invitation to Housewarming Party with appendices A through D.
People like you are probably responsible for 90% of human civilization, especially the boring but important bits. That's also my approximate level of confidence in the autism diagnosis.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link