This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
In Western countries no one is being sent to die, it's an all volunteer military. And in the US even during the height of the GWOT it remained so. As well that the feminists back then were arguing for allowing women to serve in combat arms units and the traditionalists were against. The vast majority of politicians also don't know what war costs how many of them were ever lower enlisted? Also the causality rates for the entire GWOT terror were a rounding error lower then a single major battle in WW2 or WW1. Also since no Western country is ever going "ban women from making foreign policy" Even medieval kingdoms didn't do that. It seems like then it makes sense based on your logic to demand more women in combat arms not less since then they would have "skin in the game" but realistically the Western political class is so removed from military service anyway I think this argument just doesn't have legs, unless you want to go full Heinlein which is also not going to happen. If you really view this as an unacceptable moral hazard 50 50 combat arms gender ratios are the only feasible way to solve it.
I don't think it is. I don't think hyper aggressive women unaware of the cost of violence is an issue. I think our political class using the military too easily is an issue. But Bush, Obama and Trump II have done plenty of that despite having penises and I have a hard time seeing how a woman could have been worse then Bush in terms of cavalierly using the military.
More options
Context Copy link