site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of May 25, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you're advocating for racially-based denial of rights, you might as well instead advocate for just expelling blacks from the country. We don't care to enforce our civilization on them in their native lands, why bother doing it here?

Not advocating at all for racially based denial of rights, as in gun ownership. Easier and non-discriminatory to ban gun ownership for everyone.

Same problem, why deny fundamental rights to a people who are capable of handling them for the sake of peoples who cannot? Even if you care about uplifting them (an idea I am sympathetic towards, if pessimistic of the chances of it ever happening), it’d be much easier to do once your own societal capacity is improved in their absence, like putting on your own oxygen mask before helping others.

I'm not too keen on expelling people who've been in the US since the British colonial days. Blacks were exploited as slaves, so even if blacks have problematic violence as a group it's a 'we broke it, we bought it' kind of issue in my opinion.

There's many problems with expelling blacks even if we were willing to do it:

Where are we expelling them to? Does any country in Africa have the capacity and/or willingness to absorb a massive foreign population? I don't think multiple African countries could do it sharing the population influx.

For blacks unwilling to leave voluntarily, are we using military divisions to drag them out of their homes and into a container ship? Seems like a genocide in the making.

Blacks were exploited as slaves, so even if blacks have problematic violence as a group it's a 'we broke it, we bought it' kind of issue in my opinion.

They've been "broken" since far before you involved yourself with them, and you can plausibly claim that the moral debt of slavery has been long since repaid by decades of wealth transfers in their favor.

Where are we expelling them to? Does any country in Africa have the capacity and/or willingness to absorb a massive foreign population? [...] For blacks unwilling to leave voluntarily, are we using military divisions to drag them out of their homes and into a container ship?

Quick plan I came up with in 5 minutes: seize some rural chunk of land on the West African coast (or anywhere really, in fact it might be better optics if it's not in Africa), create a settler colony there, then reintroduce transportation as a punishment for felonies following the Australian model. Considering that IIRC about 1/3 of black men will be charged with a felony in their lifetime, you could relocate millions of blacks while encouraging their friends and families to follow them in tow, all with plausible deniability for your ultimate motive. If push comes to shove, you can in fact just enforce your will on people, as has been the state of affairs for 4000 years and counting. It wouldn't be trivial, but if there's anyone who can pull it off, it's the white man.

All of this is coup-complete, of course, but so is ~every tenable solution to the problem.

Well, I agree that your proposal to expel black felons would improve the genetic pool quickly and reduce gun violence without banning firearms entirely. We may as well go further and simply expel all felons regardless of color, it would improve everyone's genetics and could be argued as a non-discriminatory policy. Also, for children over 10 who commit crimes that would result in a felony for an adult, we'd expel the child and both parents/guardians too. Otherwise we wouldn't be able to avoid 'underage' criminals as shown by @JTarrou and they would have more time to spread their genetics.

Instead of annexing land, the US might as well annex an entire country if the status quo is being discarded anyway. A non-nuclear power with poor international standing. I suggest Venezuela. Or Iran if we're willing to make the ground troops commitment anyway, may as well get rid of a long term foe.