Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 150
- 1
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'm watching Severance with my wife currently (no spoilers please). The first few episodes are a great critique of the modern workplace and how unnatural its social patterns are. How I don't mix my work friends with my personal friends, how I drop what I'm doing at 5:00 and resume my personal life, then go back in and resume my work where I left off as if not a moment has passed. How I try my best not to talk about my work outside of it because I don't want my 9-to-5 to "define me." How sometimes someone I've been working with for years will suddenly announce his departure, and I'll never see him again, and that's that. How it doesn't really bother me that much when it happens. There are a lot of parallels to my modern corporate desk job that have me reconsidering how healthy my idea of "work life balance" is. It's uncanny. What I thought was healthy compartmentalizing, when exaggerated to the extent it is in the show, suddenly seems completely farcical. Maybe I just need to find another line of work.
But the pacing of the show...holy cliffhangers dude. It's almost unbearable at this point. We're several episodes in, and by now it's a familiar pattern of [45 minutes of nothing happening] then [crazy cliffhanger or reveal at the very end]. Then the next episode starts with [immediate aftermath of cliffhanger] or [business as usual, but now you know the revealed information] and then 45 more minutes of very slow burning buildup just to be hit with another cliffhanger.
Maybe I've revealed myself as a midwit by admitting that this show makes me think or manages to surprise me. But here it is.
It's a fantastic show. Without spoiling anything in particular, you have to be patient with it at least until the last episode of S1. I understand how the pacing would come off as slow at this stage, but all of the setup pays off hugely with one of my favourite season finales put to screen.
S2 is more of a mixed bag in my opinion with some borderline nonsensical plot points towards the second half of the season, but still manages to pull itself together in a satisfying way and is very worth your time.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link