site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of June 8, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

To whitepillers: is there an argument for why I'm wrong that doesn't boil down to "you don't get it, chud, it's the New Economy! The Singularity is just around the corner! All the rules are obsolete!"? This argument is verboten, because this is pretty much what people say with every bubble.

Trump admin is engineering a massive restructuring of global capital with the intent of making America richer. It runs a spectrum from factories and reshoring to taking the oil from Venezuela. DEI Disparate Impact theories are being unwound so that productive talent that was locked up by politics will no longer be locked up. Welfare migrants are being deported and America's balance sheet is shifting toward productive economic activity again.

The global future looks very mixed as population decline will hit the entire world. Fewer people means less capital to spend and fewer things to spend capital on. Bad news if you're China or Russia or Europe or Brazil. But this will make America even more attractive for capital and investment, relative to everywhere else. We will have factories, oil, gas, tech, services, military strength, capital, youth, growth, everything.

The market is already starting to price in this future. AI and datacenters are the headline boom feeding a lot of optimism, and it might come crashing down. But the underlying economic picture is very potentially strong because the fundamentals of the American economy are stable, and getting stronger. And, to my mind, AI unlocks so many economic opportunities that it will find a purpose eventually. If it does come crashing down it will be more like the dot-com bubble than full 2008. Because a technology that transforms electricity into intellectual work is enormously productive in real terms, not just fake email job terms. The dot-com bubble killed billions of dollars of imagined wealth locked up in companies like Pets.com. But, fundamentally, there was nothing Pets.com was doing that isn't being done today. They were just ahead of the curve.

Besides, despite all evidence to the contrary, the government has learned from some of its mistakes, and I don't think they'll repeat the dot-com bubble fiasco. Washing and Bessent and DOD and Trump will funnel billions of dollars in government contracts to the AI companies, and that will keep everybody afloat. The consequences will be an entirely new set of problems relating to economic management out of Washington central offices as the greatest economic change in the means of production since the Managerial Revolution plays out. It won't even be entirely a good set of changes. But they will probably fuel a lot of medium-term growth in the terms we're talking about here, and the negative consequences will be something we will spend the rest of our lives disentangling.