This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
If you want separation, you can have separation. I do find it intriguing that the complaint there by some atheists seems to be rooted in "well why didn't god make me do it, why didn't they make me be good and set me up in such a way that I couldn't do bad things" because that seems to clash with "we want perfect freedom, no more gods needed or wanted, humanity is sufficient for itself" views around atheism.
If you don't believe god exists, hell doesn't exist, death is the end - then why cry and carry on over the non-existent? It would be like me complaining I never got my share of the gold at the end of the rainbow. God is so mean! He doesn't exist, but He's still so mean! Why isn't He Santa Claus in the sky, giving me everything I want without consequences or responsibility on my part? Well when we get FairyGodmother post-Singularity AI that makes us all immortal and rich and transhuman and colonising the entire universe so we all have our own solar systems and can get anything we want for nothing with no effort on our own parts, that'll show Him!
I think this is misrepresenting the complaint (at least the one I implicitly voiced here). The problem is not along the lines of "God wants me to be good, but I'm evil and can't help it, why did God make me this way?", and I can only see this framing emerging as a Christian (mis)interpretation of a mindset that is alien to them. Rather, it takes the form that the Christian God, as described in Christianity, is evil from the Atheist's perspective, and moreover is claimed to command everyone to do evil (as understood by the non-Christian) to earn his approval. It doesn't seem to me like the Christians I interact with (actively or passively) ever have a useful response to this, only being able to say that God is definitionally good and so the degree to which His purported nature disagrees with my understanding of the Good just is prima facie evidence of the latter being mistaken.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link