This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Yep.
Its one of those situations where the constraints in place made it more 'special.' As a student, you expect to actually run into the players on campus. They were expected to spend a full 4 years there, and attend (easy) classes. They weren't millionaires (yet) but had a good shot at making it big in the NFL if they did well.
Ultimately, I'd be fine if the college football players make money from their likeness, but the team as a whole should still feel entangled with the college its tied to in ways that aren't easily severable, and that's just completely lost now. "Student-Athlete" just isn't really a thing.
I don't want to just randomly lay another problem at the Boomers' feet, but it sure looks like they're the ones who decide to break the system by both being the deep pockets that keep pumping up the athlete's values AND keep pulling out the guardrails on various behaviors and restrictions on the athlete's loyalties b/c they want to make their preferred team as competitive as possible.
Overall seems like another example of a 'runaway' system where everyone pursuing their immediate interests shifts the whole edifice elsewhere, at the detriment of the whole.
I have many thoughts on such things.
More options
Context Copy link