Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 116
- 2
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I think he did think a lot about world building but there were either areas he forgot to tie up or couldn’t think of a way to tie things up. It’s not uncommon to have sci-fi to have holes that can not be completed.
Best I can come up with is the Targs without dragons would need to be rather poor. Where all the other houses would fight for the targs if another house tried to be king because the funds siphoned off by the royals was small and a new King would likely try and find ways to boost his income.
But overall 30 maybe 100 Targaryen blood people aren’t ruling a land without dragons. The British could rule India I assume because trade was very profitable for elites. The US ruled Afghanistan mostly with bribes (pre-invasion per capita income was $500/post invasion $1k). Not entirely sure how Britain was in with the Chinese but I’ve heard Heroin is a lot of fun. The Spanish actually fucked a lot the Aztec ruling class creating an elite and I assume had better weapons, money, and there was some religious prophecy. US, Argentina, and Australia didn’t have population centers. Ukraine is in this endless war because Poland got rich and is like 12x Ukrainian per capita income. Assad still had like 15% of the population his ethnicity pre-war and richer backers. The Jews who some say rule the world probably have average IQ a standard deviation above average and invented nukes and AI. Non of these seem to apply to what the Targs had when dragons died.
More options
Context Copy link