A weekly thread to discuss financial matters - from personal all the way up to global.
Ground Rules
- Remember that we're all just Internet randos. Don't bet your life savings on a hot tip from this thread.
- Keep culture war in the culture war thread. Yes, global events may impact our personal finances, but that does not mean we have to incessantly harp on culture war aspects here. If you are going to discuss it, please stick to the practical impacts of it on an individual level.
- Be kind. Remember that everyone here comes from different circumstances. We all have different resources available and different risk tolerances.
- Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Better is better. Celebrate people when they take a step up and work to move their finances in the right direction. Don't flame out because they haven't followed what you consider the optimal path. Everybody has to start somewhere.

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I am not a math person at all but I believe you could interpret 2rafa's wording in two different ways. She said:
This either means that you went from, say, $100 and ended up with $400 (a four hundred percent return) or you started with $100 and ended up with $500 (a total return of 400% on top of your original principal).
The first gives you 12% the second gives you 14.34%.
That is not a 400% return or +400% at all. It is +300%.
There is only one correct usage and interpretation. A return is what you end up with on top of your principal.
A 100% return is the baseline "doubled your money" case. I think you understand that a "1x", ending up at the same principal you started with, is not at all a "100% return". It is 0% return (gain).
Count upwards:
+0% is 1x. +100% is 2x. +200% is 3x. +300% is 4x. +400% is 5x.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link