This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Interesting. I hadn't seen SpaceX talking about orbits higher than GTO, so I assumed that was as high as they went. If SpaceX is putting the craft in trans-lunar coast, they can definitely claim credit and blame for the lunar mission if they want, but they still don't get to cherrypick.
I'm a huge SpaceX fan, but you're being more generous now than I would be! Beresheet crashed. Hakuto-R 1 and 2 crashed. IM-1 tilted. IM-2 tipped over. Yay for Blue Ghost (and for IM-1, honestly, and for the survivors of the similarly mixed lunar lander record with other launchers and countries), but the success of any full lunar lander missions is clearly resting in large part on the success of a very difficult mission phase that SpaceX has yet to attempt themselves and can't claim credit for. SpaceX can only claim credit for their own (also difficult!) contributions to those missions. SpaceX does have a pretty amazing record these days with vastly larger autonomous rocket-powered landers, ones that are fighting 6 times the gravity and infinity times the wind, but looking at those Intuitive Machines results I still worry about the future. I hope we'll see the uncrewed Starship HLS land perfectly before we try putting any humans on such a tall lander aimed at an unprepared landing site.
I thought that was pretty much all Falcon Heavy turned out to be good for, after Falcon 9 payload growth ate its lunch from below. Looking at the FH launch list, I guess I'm wrong, and there were a few GTO launches (for satellites that would have been too heavy to use its upper stage for the apogee burn while still recovering boosters? simply for conservative customers?), but otherwise there's a bunch of GEO, plus the asteroid belt and Jupiter, with Earth-Sun L2 and the moon slated for later this year. Aside from the moon, Falcon 9 has already done Earth-Sun Lagrange points and the asteroid belt. It's just that LEO/GTO/GEO are where the money is for now.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link