This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
It's pretty dishonest to not include the fall of the ottoman empire in this analysis. A whole lot of events happened between 1919 and the nakba. The Jews aren't the only actors on the world stage.
Not sure what you mean. I was thinking in terms of Palestinian Arab x Jewish relations in Palestine proper. AFAIK there wasn’t a lot of violent animosity in this period, and even though there wasn’t a high population, we should expect more violence if the thesis “Palestinians will always be violent to Jews” were correct. Or do you mean that the Arabs would have been violent but the Ottoman Turks prevented it?
The Ottoman Turks ran the territory, not the Palestinians, and the whole mandate period was a question of precisely how that territory was to be handed off from legitimate British control to local management. The whole of the post-Ottoman territory was going through this proto-nationalist phase, the Jews were not uniquely trying to cut out a piece. Many of them were fleeing other previously Turk run territories going through their own nationalist movements. I'm not trying to say they behaved as angels or anything, there were lots of tit for tat escalations going on as different populations laid claim. But to just gloss it as "in the 1919 apropos of nothing the jews hatched a plan to conqueror the peaceful Arab land" is ahistorical. Much of the original land was bought from Arab landlords who were themselves granted ownership from the Ottomans as legitimately as such things were done back then. Which certainly sucked for the Arab tenants that the new Jewish land owners kicked off the land and I don't blame them necessarily for fighting back but you're putting a hell of an isolated demand for non-national sentiment on the Jews just after they watched millions of their brothers and sisters get slaughtered.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link