Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 217
- 2
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Allegedly he was also on charges for resisting arrest and drug possession, had a drug debt of $13,000, and was going to be fired from the job anyway. So that gives him more motive to skip out, and maybe hustle a naive co-worker into helping him with the ends of "get this guy to give me money by a sob story". If he semi-truthfully told him "Man, I'm in a bind, I'm gonna get fired and I owe a ton of money to bad guys who will put me in the hospital, any way you can help me out with a temporary loan?" he might have been able to talk him into driving him to the meet to pay off some of the bad guys. Stark meets his drug dealer, persuades him that they can get some or all of the money out of this pigeon, and the three of them head off together to take out the $500 and Branning ends up dead however it happens.
It's true that it can't be established how Branning met his death or that Stark had anything to do with it, but there's a lot of blank space in between that needs explanation. I agree that he was convicted on circumstantial evidence and suspicion, so the quashing of the verdict is correct, but there is something that went on that has not been adequately explained; for instance, why would Branning drive off to New Jersey with this guy and never contact his family? Maybe he did have a dark secret life that his family never knew about, but the cops would have been looking for something like that to explain what happened to him, and nothing seems to have turned up:
More options
Context Copy link