site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of July 27, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

First, it seems to me that there was little in the way of chattel slavery in England before colonization. There were serfs, sure, but they were generally if barely considered as human beings, being Christian and all. Chattel slavery is a different category from that.

The other thing is that most nations did not set out to become a nation which did things better than existing nations did, the US is the exception here. "Slavery was normal" works equally well as an excuse for Leopold II as it works for the US. Most apologists of the US argue (often convincingly) that the system (freedom, democracy, rights) is what set the US apart from contemporaries. "Hey, we were no worse than Leo II" is not a great way to plead exceptionalism.

First, it seems to me that there was little in the way of chattel slavery in England before colonization.

Slavery was extremely common in Europe before the medieval era, when it was phased out for serfdom. Just like it was common across Asia, Africa, and the Americas up until modern times.

"Hey, we were no worse than Leo II" is not a great way to plead exceptionalism.

Why mention Leo instead of, say, The Woman King?

But the point is entirely backwards. "Hey, you did this thing everyone else did too until you decided it offended you, and then stopped at great cost and tried to make everyone else stop too" is a terrible argument that the US is exceptionally bad. The only people who can plausibly claim to have done better are the very European nations that started the trans-Atlantic slave trade in the first place and sold the peak.

Meanwhile, the early US was itself being actively raided by slavers. Find me a single Turk willing to grovel like an American progressive for the way they enslaved my Italian and American ancestors - consider it table stakes for me to care about accusations regarding American slavery. Turkey didn't abolish slavery until 1924. I recommend perusing that whole article, actually. It's great for getting an overview of the extent of the issue, and who exactly ever cared.