This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Or you could just move to the libertarian utopia of Somalia, where state capacity is low and you do not have to pay taxes to government.
I am rather sure that most countries pay for their passports. Likewise, "indirect taxation" is inherent in every taxation system I know. "You are not only paying your own taxes, you are paying (through increased prices) the income tax of the mechanic who fixed the engine of the farmer who farmed the corn in your burrito".
The forced labor part was really straining my suspension of disbelief. Waiting in line to recycle your cans using the German system. The horror. It is basically Sered' all over again. They do not even reimburse you for the water you need to clean your cans. I am sure that Amnesty International will start a new campaign on the drink can slavery problem any day now.
(FWIW, I agree that the EU has a general problem with too much red tape. The problem is that the costs of reporting requirements is not coming directly from the EU budget, but is treated as an externality. "Gender pay gap reporting will lose tax revenue on the order of $whatever Euros" is not a framing used as often as it should be used.)
I do not think that the answer is going off grid and farming your own burritos. Quite simply, the gains from division of labor and better scaling are much higher than the tax burden even if the tax burden is 80%. If I need to get an X-ray for a pet, it is tremendously more effective to pay heavily taxed income to some vet who in turn payed a lot for an X-ray machine produced under these suffocating tax and regulatory burdens rather than simply building your own X-ray machine.
While overwrought, it is entirely possible to have a perfectly functional society with much more modest tax burdens.
More options
Context Copy link
This does seem like a dubious dichotomy. The statecraft of prosperous countries has converged to a remarkable degree, but that doesn't mean that "the way prosperous countries do it" and being piss poor are the only two options. Complain about absolute monarchy in 1000 AD, and your snarky interlocutor might have suggested that you just move to the anarchist utopia of Greenland instead!
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link