site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of August 10, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't know how

Simple: I don't acknowledge your capability for self-reflection, thus I don't trust your interpretation of your position (or anything).

if the systems don't get much better then my diagnoses of doom doesn't hold

This kind of condescension is part of the reason I don't like you. No, they will get strongly superhuman, fast. Your diagnosis will still be wrong.

If GAs are just fable or even mythos in a box then sure, a neat product

Even Fable is superhuman in the limit of self-developing instruments and effectors, but of course we're not stopping here.

If you think we're not going to get meaningful recursive self improvement and an intelligence explosion

We are in the middle stage of the intelligence explosion. Models developing RL tasks for their 0.1 increments that do these kinds of gains on DeepSWE is recursive self-improvement. Of course it's going faster inside frontier labs, and we'll have to accelerate a lot yet, but if you expect some sort of direct self-editing, the way Yud wanted his XML AGI to work, you're likely wrong.

Do you think mythos but cheaper tokenomics is basically as smart as it gets?

I also don't acknowledge your ability to form a theory of mind.

This kind of condescension is part of the reason I don't like you.

Condescension? In this thread? Heaven forbid!

Maybe you could enlighten me, as deficient as I clearly am in modeling your worldview. How capable do you think these things are going to get approximately? A nation of geniuses in a datacenter, to use a phrasing I'm sure grates you, seems capable to me of determining your intentions with your stepmother without even reading your mind whether it be in your skull or delegated to GA. Likewise they'd seem able to dispatch a drone or whatever to place a bullet basically wherever they'd want.