site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of August 17, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Ellis

"Roughly equivalent" has to do a lot of work

But it's necessary work, in my opinion. So for example, as best as I can tell from the Wikipedia article, Ellis became a full professor in 1979 and started BSing about his past some time after 1981. Moreover, the lies he told were not outrageous on their face, or even highly suspect.

In my view, it would have been roughly equivalent if (1) he'd claimed to have been a medal of honor winner who had singledhandedly prevented a massacre of a village; and (2) he had made the claim publicly BEFORE being hired and/or promoted. But I don't think something like that would have happened. Because people aren't (and weren't) afraid to express skepticism about a straight white man in the way in that in 2026 people are afraid to express skepticism about a black person.

I think that most people have met compulsive liars in their lives. People who constantly tell stories which are just not that believable on their face. For the most part, such people just aren't taken seriously. In my view, what's different about this case is that (1) the compulsive liar was a black person; (2) Cambridge University desperately wanted to hire a black person to be a professor; and (3) people in academia are (legitimately) scared to death of publicly criticizing a black academic.

In other words, it seems to me this is all about race and is not just some kind of generalized groupthink phenomenon which could just as easily apply to a white person. A white person who was a compulsive liar would, generally speaking NOT get into a situation like this.