This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Not OP, but I think there's a difference between the freedom to provide a given service or not, and the freedom to refuse service to particular customers. Much as it should be clubs' choice whether they put on minstrel shows or drag shows, it should be a bakery's choice whether or not they want to sell rainbow-colored pride cakes. But the proper comparison for whether the bakery can refuse to sell a standard wedding cake to a pair of gay fiancés isn't that: it's whether the minstrel club can bar black people, or the gay club bar straight people, from entry.
Now you might argue that all of these fall under freedom-of-association, and I can certainly respect freedom-of-association absolutism as far as it goes. But they still seem like two easily-distinguished subcategories where I don't think you need to be biased in any specific direction to support one and not the other.
But of course if they want to bar people with incorrect political views, freedom-of-association is right back on the table.
More options
Context Copy link
It’s a fuzzy line.
What if the person isn’t baking a cake but officiating weddings, should they be forced to accommodate gay ones as long as they follow the same script as straight ones?
On the other hand, the person baking cakes won’t know whether their clients are gay without obnoxious vetting which would hurt their business. A man and woman can walk into the store and order a cake, then give it to their gay friends.
I believe freedom of association should work like that: a seller can refuse “service”, but once they provide it, can’t restrict the buyer or force them to retract.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link