site banner
PaperclipPerfector  7d ago (text post)   3255 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for September 6, 2026

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

3
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It’s no so much that such “dangerous techniques don’t exist or could not in theory be pulled off. But if your “training” for a finger snap is never actually done full speed against an actual resisting opponent, you will not snap the fingers. And worse, you’ll probably end up doing something stupid in the attempt that puts you in danger or prevents your escape. Worse yet, the mistaken belief that I know how to defend myself means im much more likely to get into danger either through complacency (not leaving a bad situation quickly enough), or poor awareness (not noticing the danger until they’re ready to attack) or going to places that are known to be dangerous (bars in inner cities at 3am).

In your case, the wicked right hook is probably your best bet bet because you’ve spent the time and energy learning how to tag someone full force while they are actively working to prevent that. You are very likely to be able to right hook someone in an unorthodox place on their body, but that’s not a different technique, it’s a different application of a technique you’ve trained for hours a week.

But if your “training” for a finger snap is never actually done full speed against an actual resisting opponent, you will not snap the fingers.

I don't think you're wrong about the general principle, but I'm not sure about the specific example: I kinda refuse to believe that it's hard to actually break a finger. However it's not necessarily a move that you will have much chance to employ unless someone puts their hands on you in a convenient way.

To extend the idea of what I am talking about a bit further - you cannot train in full speed against an actual resisting opponent to shoot them. But given the option, you generally you should shoot them instead of punching them, even if you have more realistic training experience punching people.

To your point here:

You are very likely to be able to right hook someone in an unorthodox place on their body, but that’s not a different technique, it’s a different application of a technique you’ve trained for hours a week.

I very much agree (and that's how training to shoot works, too).

Paintball is exactly an opponent resisting being shot fwiw

I've done airsoft and greatly enjoyed it. Wish I could find a paintball or airsoft place close by.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats