site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of September 14, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

1
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, sadly, none of the AI companies have given us a ton of reason to trust them. I think we're kind of lucky that it ended up being a two- or three- (remember Gemini?) or even four-way race (Grok isn't terrible ya know). My outside opinion is that OpenAI is the most liberty-minded of the first three, but I think even they would be happily walling off capabilities if it didn't mean losing business to their competitors.

I still hold a deep, deep grudge against DeepMind (and Google) for revolutionizing computer Go ... and then not giving us access to it. They could have made a huge profit off of AlphaGo - Go players would happily pay hand over fist for access to it - but daddy Google wouldn't even notice a few million in profit here or there and it wasn't worth taking time out from their research playground to make tens of thousands of players happy. Or, you know, usher in a new wave of strategic innovation in one of humanity's oldest games. BO-ring!

Remember, Google had internal chatbots years before ChatGPT.

The Google Brain research team, who developed Meena, hoped to release the chatbot to the public in a limited capacity, but corporate executives refused on the grounds that Meena violated Google's "AI principles around safety and fairness".

If it wasn't for OpenAI catching up, they might still be sitting on them for "safety reasons" (and coincidentally also protecting their main product, search). That's the future if they win - tons of prestigious AI papers for them, almost nothing for us consumers, because we're just not worth the trouble. And Anthropic might be even worse, since, like you said, they really do think they're holding back technology for our own good.

OpenAI's far from a perfect company, but man, I'll take what I can get.