This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
In surveys like the ACS, Hispanics as a broad group (there is considerable internal diversity, although it's generally dwarfed by the distance to the broad non-Hispanic white group) hold lots of positions that rhyme with or are basically the same as those held by typical Red Tribe members, especially as far as interpersonal & religious morality is concerned, but on any question touching on matters of state and power they diverge completely. Hispanics by and large want a potent state that taxes heavily and actively redistributes, restricts free speech for social harmony and spends lots of money on disadvantaged minorities, at least as far as their answers in the ACS go (this is also independent of party affiliation, Cubans vote Republican, yet their stated preferences are almost indistinguishable from heavily Democrat Puerto Ricans or Mexicans). In other words they completely lack the libertarian, don't-tread-on-me attitude that pervades the current Red Tribe. American conservatism as thought of by its mostly white practitioners and defenders is fairly alien to Hispanics (and non-whites in general, e.g. Asians fit the economic side a bit better but mostly lack the Christian and classical liberal aspects in their expressed world views).
If MAGA or the Republicans absorb more Hispanic voters, it's IMO much more likely that the policy platform will change significantly than that there will be a Jeffersonian republic with Spanish surnames.
Is this a majority of Republicans? It certainly describes a faction of Republicans and likely the majority in places like Nevada and Wyoming. But the religious right when it was ascendant certainly didn't have those attitudes.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link