This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
As others have noted, this is a misstatement of "privilege theory." That theory does not state that everything done by those in power is purposely done to help those with privilege. Rather, it states that society is structured in a way such that some people, because of their race, gender, or whatever, get certain advantages or are spared certain costs that are experienced by others of different races, genders, or whatever, and that assumptions about what is normal tend to be shaped by the experiences of those with "privilege."
For example, years ago I rented an apartment in what was supposedly a marginally unsafe area. But I never felt unsafe, including walking late at night a couple of blocks from where I had to park to where my apartment was. However, I am a guy, so I did not have to worry about being sexually assaulted, and for all I know the signs of risk of sexual assault might have been present, but I was oblivious. A woman might well have been at risk in that area. That is a form of "male privilege." (And, in fact, my landlord told me that she rented to me over a woman who also applied because she was not comfortable renting to a woman in that area).
Similarly, when I first started teaching, I was told: "Don't assume that every kid has a quiet place to do homework at home." The assumption that every kid has such a place is a form of "class privilege."
None of this is to say that the concept is not often, or even frequently, trotted out and used stupidly, dishonestly, or both. Nor does it mean that privilege, even to the extent it exists, has much actual effect; it could well be quite trivial. But you are attacking a strawman.
But note, your supposed privilege here is entirely based on your own feelings and perception, and not reality, which is that males are many times more likely to be the victim of violent crime than females.
Is a person actually privileged if they only feel privileged because they have been psychologically conditioned to feel privileged? This does lead directly to quality of life enhancements so it's not entirely a theoretical question but that does suggest that the solution to many cases of disprivilege would be to psychologically coach a feeling of empowerment rather than changing the reality of the world, and this is exactly the opposite of how privilege theory is received at large.
I specifically referred to sexual assault.
Men are more likely to be the victim of violent crimes because they are more likely to engage in altercations. But I am talking about the risk of being the victim of a crime while minding one's own business walking home at night. I believe that women are more likely than men to be a victim in that context.
Do you have a citation on that second point? I haven't seen any hard data on that, but I think it may be confounded by frequency with which men are forced into more dangerous situations for criminal violence via occupation (night shift, security guards, etc) and their statistical propensity for perhaps-careless-but-not-illegal risk taking.
Well, this says that the rate of violent crime victimization for women was about the same in 2018 and 2019, so since, as you note, men are more likely to be in dangerous situations and have a propensity for risk-taking, that implies that women who are just minding their own business are indeed at greater risk than are men. And that is purely quantitative; it ignores the qualitative aspect of being a victim of rape or sexual assault.
Note that the fact that men are careless might well be evidence of "privilege" -- men can "carelessly" walk home late at night because they are at very low risk of sexual assault. They can better afford to be careless than can women.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link