Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This week I learned that the world’s most valuable piece of religious art is a solid gold statue of Buddha located in Thailand. The statue was covered in plaster to conceal its value during a war in the 1760s, and its true nature was only rediscovered in 1955 when workmen accidentally dropped it, causing some of the plaster to chip. It contains 5.5 tonnes (over 12,000 pounds) of gold. During the gold rally earlier this year, that would have given it a melt value of over $1 billion.
The statue’s history is pretty wild when you realize its worth. It sat in an abandoned temple in a ruined city for decades, then was moved to a new temple that had recently been built in Bangkok. When that temple fell into disrepair and was closed, it was moved to a small, insignificant temple in a nearby suburb. Since that temple didn’t have a tall enough building to house the statue, it sat for 20 years in an open shelter with a tin roof.
When reading about the above, I couldn’t help but be reminded of another famous solid gold statue—a 15.9 lb golden rooster that the federal government seized in 1960 as a violation of the Gold Reserve Act, which made it a criminal offense for Americans to own or trade gold, except in the case of collectibles. In its case, United States v. One Solid Gold Object in Form of a Rooster the government argued that the statue shouldn’t be considered a work of art both because it contained too much gold and because it was being used to advertise a casino (and apparently ads can’t be art). After the jury ruled in favor of the rooster, the government’s appeal pointed out that the ruling might encourage Americans to produce 200 oz. golden steers. They apparently didn’t contemplate the production of 194,000 ounce statues.
The US government is a jealous god and will permit no idolatrous worship.
I love this phrase.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link