This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Still not sure what you mean by 'chain letter curse'. Are you talking about 22:18-19? Revelation was a letter written to the churches that was meant to be copied and distributed, and this warning is pretty standard - don't change anything in this letter when you copy it. There's no curse for reading it and then failing to pass it on, which is what 'chain letter curse' implies. At this point I feel like you're just making things up all over the place.
This is not a standard warning:
This is a ridiculous, chain letter curse. When I de-canonize this and say it didn't happen, I take every word away from it. The text itself curses me. That is unacceptable epistemologically and I take it to mean the correct decision is to through it out of the canon.
And this is after vivid lake of fire for unbelievers stuff. So arguably anywhere else in the Bible where it says Gehenna, fire, or outer darkness for unbelievers, it's implying if you, idk, declare the book of Matthew invalid, you can go to hell. Again, unacceptable as instead of convincing with evidence it just spiritually threatens you. My method is not designed to remove hell theology but it largely goes away even if I hold the chain mail letter curse clause, so I think I'm on to something when I observe that this is lowly, despicible, and ugly behavior, not fit for the highest God, rather fit for some corrupters who want to keep worshiping their tribal god.
Okay, I'm not sure if you know what a chain letter is? A chain letter would say something like 'forward this letter to three people or you will be cursed'. Revelation says 'if you forward (I.e. teach the contents of) this letter, you will be punished if you alter it'.
Imagine I sent a letter with some of my teachings to my student, saying 'hey student, please go ahead and teach this to people, but if you're teaching it in my name don't add any of your own ideas in there!' That would be eminently reasonable. Now imagine if the letter is an actual inspired prophecy from God, in which case editing it is literal sacrilege.
You get worked up over the strangest things. Pretty much every other OT prophet, not to mention Jesus himself, also told the people to believe them. As does literally anyone else trying to teach literally anything. Seriously I can't get over what an absurd objection this is.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link