site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 2, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I would reverse this. Soros is a big supporter of progressive causes and candidates. Conservatives correctly point that out and are treated like crazed conspiracy theorists for doing so.

They aren't worked up about Murdock and Musk because they're allies. The American colonists bitterly resented the Hessian mercenaries sent to battle them. At the same time they liked Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben and made him a high ranking officer and followed his advice on professionalizing the continental army. Foreign mercenaries who are your allies are of course welcome.

I'd also point out that the Koch brothers were the equivalent for the other side. People notice motivated billionaires like them or Bloomberg funding ideological groups to influence American politics. Soros isn't special in this regard.

I'm going to roll my response into @porkpiehat here, since the thrust is largely the same.

Conservatives correctly point that out and are treated like crazed conspiracy theorists for doing so.

I'm sorry, but no. A perennial problem with cranks is that they find something that is true, conflate it with something that looks kind of like the thing that is true, and then run wild with tenuous inferences from the factoid. Right-wingers don't merely claim that George Soros gives lots of money to progressive causes. There is a whole raft of Soros-related crank theories which go well beyond "Soros gives lots of money to progressive candidates" or even "Soros is the architect behind the American progressive movements" (untrue, but at least not totally absurd) and into "Soros is a global puppetmaster orchestrating civil unrest around the world."

Soros isn't special in this regard

I disagree. Yes, people get worked up about wealthy donors that oppose them and don't get worked up about the ones that support them, but Soros is not treated in a manner equivalent to Koch or Bloomberg.

-- porkpiehat

I don't really buy the argument that it's because he's a foreigner getting involved in local elections. At the very least, I don't think that's anywhere near sufficient to explain the level of paranoia around Soros specifically, which are too wide-ranging and too enduring (my friends were making jokes about Sorosbux like ten years ago, for example) to be explained by something as simple as "Soros DAs". Soros is an American citizen, so compare/contrast RW reactions to other foreign-born billionaires like Rupert Murdoch or Elon Musk or Miriam Adelson. He's not the only billionaire donor quietly putting significant money into state/local elections.

I get that a lot of it is just "It's okay when Our Guy does it, but Soros isn't Our Guy," but as mentioned, he's not even the only lib doing it. No one seems to think Mike Bloomberg is hiring crisis actors.

I agree Bloomberg gets too little heat given what he does. He is distorting all of American politics through his large donations. "Why doesn't this Democratic candidate pump the brakes on the gun grabbing talk in order to win in their purple or purple-red district? Why are they literally shouting that they're coming for my AR15?" Because Bloomberg.

In my personal experience someone rightfully points out that Soros is funding something and then they get smeared as a Jew-hating conspiritard. Neutral and correct statements about his donations and their impact are lumped in with the crank theories. I don't engage with the cranks. I just notice normie correct complaints about Soros smeared as crankery.