This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Indians/Asians are the ones who truly care about grooming gangs.
English people who complain about illegal immigration, grooming gangs or terrorism are often not really animated by those issues but are upset that they don't feel at home in their country. English are losing their sense of belonging, their culture, and their community. Terrorism or crime aren't really impacting that many people, and car crashes or excess salt in diets cause more harm than migrant crimes or ISIS. Living in an atomizing housing block next to a Somali family instead of a community in which people know each other and that feels English is what is motivating an anti immigration sentiment. Since people don't want to say that they prefer living in a traditional English community but instead have to move to an area with good schools and complain about 0.000001% of the population getting killed by mentally ill ISIS supporter.
In my experience, Indians have a utilitarian perspective on society. They don't really have much sentimental attachment to it but rather see it as a transportation system, a medical system, a market place and an investment. If English people are replaced by Chinese their real estate investment might go up. Pakistanis raping girls in their area is clearly not good for business so they want them shut down. Their perspective isn't ideological, their perspective is a question of profit. Boat migrants are not profitable, jihadists are not profitable, groomers are not profitable.
Do you have experience with Indians in India? Or do you only have experience with Indians in western countries? Foreigners in a society aren't going to care about it as much as people who are actually indigenous to that society. Do Hindu nationalists have a "utilitarian perspective" on society? (Honest question.)
This is probably answered by the sentence just prior.
HinduNats believe they're entitled to a certain society that they haven't quite achieved (in their view), a society that's purely territorial and can only be achieved on the subcontinent. When subcontinental issues become part of UK culture wars, then yeah, they're gonna feel especially more loyal to their society of heritage and not their hosts. Because the one thing I can tell you is that Indians take things super personal. Are Brit Pakistanis who routinely demand that the UK must bring up Kashmir more loyal to British society or they are more loyal to Pakistan? After all, the tidings in Kashmir don't directly affect the average English in any way. It's just a rat race to "prove" that the other side must not be believed, but perhaps the Indians will find a bit more purchase because their demand (at least, insofar as Indian officials are concerned) is that foreigners stop making issues domestic to South Asia their own, stop obsessing about it so much and "mind their own business"?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link