This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
That strikes me as a perverse sort of applause light. It belongs in the same category as "They hated Him because He told the truth": a zinger designed specifically for people who already buy into the premise. I'm sure plenty of readers saw it, immediately thought of examples like you've provided here, upvoted and moved on. Please clap. For those who disagreed with your premise, there wasn't a lot to work with. This version of your argument is way better.
With my whinging out of the way, I want to riff off of @ActuallyATleilaxuGhola. Well, I want to go further than 20%. The vast majority of Trump Derangement Syndrome, political prosecution, Congressional mummery--it can be explained with the phrase "he can't keep getting away with it!"
People don't like to admit that. They'll prevaricate about eroding norms or unpresidential conduct or reduced credibility abroad. But those are symptoms. Hatred and revulsion are reflexes to the perception that justice was not served. It's not that he won, it's that he won after doing something that was supposed to disqualify him. Something that theoretically would have sunk a less charismatic campaign. There were a lot of "somethings," each an opportunity for political opponents to board that train, and once they were on board, they had a direct route to becoming personal opponents. Trump offends people more than Ted Cruz or Jeb! ever could, because he hits their sense of fairness.
It's important to note that this is near orthogonal to any actual, you know, guilt. People who play the game surely "get away with it" more often than those who don't. I could believe they commit more crime, given their greater means, than normal citizens. How might real estate moguls stack up?
That's all you need to explain the constant baying for Trump's head.
More options
Context Copy link