site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 3, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

12
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Considering the vast bulk of the documentation relating to Reinhard was ordered "destroyed as soon as possible."

There are hundreds and hundreds of surviving documents pertaining to the Reinhardt operation. They point to the economic objective of the operation, even by the admission of the Majdanek Museum. Most importantly, the top-secret direct report from Globocnik to Himmler was preserved. If Himmler really did put Globocnik in charge of the extermination of the Jews, how could you possibly ask for a better source than a direct, top-secret final report from the man who did it to the man who ordered it?

But as it happens, the report just provides validation for the Revisionist position while the mainstream historians are left pointing to a passage here and there from a speech in Posen, rather than the actual direct report sent to Himmler on the operation a few months later. To me, that speaks volumes that one side is pointing to things like "what do you mean this people" and the other side is pointing to the actual top-secret document reporting exactly what the operation was and what its results were.

There are hundreds and hundreds of surviving documents pertaining to the Reinhardt operation.

There used to be a lot more before it was ordered destroyed, as Globocnik explicitly notes in the final report.

Also:

The entire Action Reinhardt is divided into four spheres: A. The expulsion itself. B. The employment of labour. C. The exploitation of property. D. Seizure of hidden goods and landed property.

So Reinhardt involved much more than the exploitation of property.

If Himmler really did put Globocnik in charge of the extermination of the Jews, how could you possibly ask for a better source than a direct, top-secret final report from the man who did it to the man who ordered it?

How about hearing it from the mouth of the man who ordered it himself?

to me, that speaks volumes that one side is pointing to things like "what do you mean this people"

There is also the unexplained demographic collapse of eastern European Jewry, the staffing of the Reinhard camps with former T4 euthanasia men, thousands of eyewitnesses both hostile and otherwise, and massive quantities of human remains in the ground at Belzec. But the German secret police chief admitting on tape that he undertook to "wipe a people off the face of the earth" is pretty good too.