site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 17, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

8
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I understand the frustration. IdPol issues can be fairly abstract and distant until they afflict your family.

It has happened. The transgender trend has hit close to home, with a close relative now insisting that we call his five-year-old, penis-having child a "girl." I have had a couple of conversations with the dad, and he repeated of the common transgender talking points.

It’s very possible the five-year-old may not be a penis-haver in the near future under the current paradigm.

It’s especially tricky if the parent(s) of the child, as is the case here, is/are supportive of a pathway that you disagree with. The parent(s) has/have greater skin in the game—and ultimately, legal rights. It’s the father’s child after all and it appears he’s supportive of the wars that will come.

On one hand, natural selection. On the other hand, if you abstain from the matter, you may be abdicating your fiduciary responsibilities as an older male family member.

Whereas for a girl, they will hit 18 or 19 and suddenly have massive amounts of power purely on account of who they are. A pretty 20-year-old intern can make the CEO of a billion dollar company stutter and blush merely on account of how she looks.

It’s not sudden, if we do a tidbit of extrapolation. Absent social shaming and/or legal grandstanding, 16 to 18 year-old girls would crush 26 to 28 year-old women, much less 36 to 38 year-old women, when it comes to desirability. The classic Dataclysm chart and Bruch & Newman, 2018.

She will get stares and attention from men of all sorts. Thus the job of father in raising a daughter is both protecting her from the men who would prey on her, and also teaching her not to abuse or misuse this sexual power she will have.

Chris Rock characterised the paternal role as keeping your daughter off the pole.

In recent years I’ve made an effort toward being more “huggy” with family members overall. For younger female family members, it’s implicitly like a “hey, by the way, I and we (other family members) care about you a lot, don’t be a hoe.” For older female members, it’s to say “hey, you’re not invisible! I and we value you. Don’t die.” For younger male family members, it’s like “Okay, men are human doings. However, I and we will always be there for you! Don’t get discouraged.” For older male family members, it’s akin to “Thank you for being there for me and I’ll remember and be there for you. Don’t die.”

And yeah men are generally much stronger and more physically capable than women. Men have the burden of performance, and are hyperagentic compared to the hypoagency of women. Men are playing on Nightmare mode instead of Tutorial mode. However, this should be preaching to the choir.

Hence why MTF transsexuals garner much more skepticism than FTM transsexuals, even from normies. The "trans" culture war for adults is almost entirely about MTF transsexuals. MTF transsexuals are potentially trying to coopt the Wonderfulness, privileges, and protections afforded to women, like stolen valor. Whereas FTM are subscribing to life on a more difficult setting.

Sports, careers, chess, and even bathrooms (full-circle, I suppose) reinforce that maleness is open-league. Young teenage boys beating professional women at sports has long been par for the course.

Young women will hold hands with their girlfriends, elephant-walk, and openly cut in front of men for access to men's restrooms in bars and clubs, but the opposite does not occur. The elephant-parade even serves to garner more male attention. Oh hey there, teehee, us girls need to pee.

The biggest difference between men and women is that when you're a man, the absolute indifference of the universe towards you is the norm, it will only care when you make it care, and only for brief moments. To women this is almost Lovecraftian horror they can't conceive of. Men don't realize that most women can never comprehend this because it's just too horrifying to the female psychology. Women live their entire lives knowing people care about them, they take it for granted, it's the universal constant norm for 95 percent of women. We care about them as children because humans generally care about the happiness and suffering of all children.

As Daniel Tosh joked in the halcyon days of the early 201Xs: "Being an ugly chick is like being a man: You're gonna have to work." The male vs. female experience is only more extreme nowadays, given the Tinderpocalypse and greater feminist/DEI entrenchment in academia, workplaces, and culture.

16 to 18 year-old girls would crush 26 to 28 year-old women, much less 36 to 38 year-old women when it comes to desirability. The classic Dataclysm chart and Bruch & Newman, 2018.

Hah. If we had a base-9 number system, the whole chart would say 18.

It would say 22, wouldn't it?

We wouldn't have the same terms. but the base-9 equivalent of '10' (the aesthetically satisfyingly number) would occur every 9 numbers.