site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 17, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

8
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Fear" is a strong word. There are absolutely people who disagree with the progressive/woke consensus orthodoxy, but hold their tongues out of genuine fear of personal or professional repercussions. I think in most cases it's not so much fear as garden-variety conformity: wanting to fit in, not to be seen as weird. Most people aren't thinking "I'd better mouth the words 'defund the police', because if I don't, I'll lose my job": they're thinking "all my friends are saying 'defund the police', so I'll say it too, to fit in".

Remember the Bataclan shooting, when people overlaid the French flag on top of their profile pictures on Facebook? I'm quite confident that a significant minority (if not an actual majority) of people doing so have no idea what it was intended to symbolise, and if I asked them "that shooting in the Bataclan was so horrific, wasn't it?" they wouldn't have a clue what I was talking about. It's not that these people think the shooting in the Bataclan was good, but pretended to think it was bad for fear of personal or professional repercussions - this isn't a Havel's greengrocer situation. It's that these people saw other people in their social circle overlaying the French flag on their profile pictures, and did likewise to fit in, at no point stopping to consider why their friends were overlaying the French flag on their profile pictures. Conformity for conformity's sake.

"So you're saying that most people calling for the police to be defunded or abolished are only doing so because they saw their friends doing so, no different from adopting a trendy hairstyle, and have put essentially zero thought into the practical implications of such a policy?" yeschad.jpg

But keep in mind. Being a nonconformist on the wrong things, even if they aren’t obvious can be harmful for your lifestyle. You might think that letting parents have a say in the types of books in the elementary school library is no big deal. But it later becomes a culture war thing and now that opinion is problematic. So there’s a pressure to conform beyond what would exist on most other issues (for example ask about what should be taught in a math class and whether parents should get a say, or whether violent books can be kept out of elementary schools) simply because it’s hard to know if some issue will become a shibboleth. That coupled with the permanent record created by social media makes “going along with the herd” a solid defense strategy. That’s a bit different from hairstyles which you can easily discard and nobody will care.