This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
As I explicitly stated in the article, the fact that I believe wokeness originated in the US (and perhaps some components originated elsewhere) has nothing to do with the object-level question of whether wokeness is factually or normatively true. In the counterfactual universe where wokeness was indigenous to Ireland, I would find it exactly as distasteful as I do in this universe.
That being said, I do think many components of wokeness did originate in the US rather than Europe. The term "intersectionality" was coined by Kimberle Crenshaw, an American academic. Modern queer theory draws hugely on the writings of Judith Butler, an American academic (last semester my girlfriend did a "gender justice" module in an Irish university and had to read Butler). Radical feminism draws heavily on Andrea Dworkin. The whole concept of the "progressive stack" came from the Occupy Wall St protests.
And more than ideology, the language Irish people use betrays its origins, like George Nkencho's brother demanding that the "fed" that shot George be "terminated". If it was Europe that dominated the cultural hegemony, he could have demanded that the "gendarme" or "bobby" be terminated, either of which would have been just as inaccurate as calling him a "fed" - but he didn't.
In any case you concede the point that, whatever the origins of wokeness, it isn't indigenous to Ireland, so it is hypocritical for Irish progressives to mock Irish conservatives for importing their values and tactics from overseas.
The analogy doesn't work. Facebook was founded by Americans and was first made available in elite American universities; it retained remnants of the culture of elite American universities long after expanding into the wider world. In December 2020, about one-third of their staff were still based in the US. While Spotify was founded in Sweden, it's not like they started off exclusively hosting Swedish artists and podcasters before expanding into international artists - Anglophone music and podcasts have been their bread and butter since day one. Look at their most-streamed artists by year (and streaming stats follow a power law distribution, so the most popular artists actually accrue a huge majority of total streams): there's exactly one Swedish artist in the top 5 of any given year (Avicii, and his lyrics are exclusively in English) and only five artists from non-Anglophone nations (Avicii [lyrics in English], Daft Punk [lyrics in English], J Balvin, Bad Bunny, BTS). The rest are artists from Anglophone nations, chiefly the US. I can't find comparable stats for podcasting, but their most popular podcast is The Joe Rogan Experience. I also can't remember a single instance in which Spotify waded into a Sweden-specific culture war (though I'm open to correction), but they loudly and conspicuously waded into several American ones. Hell, most of their employees are based in the US, more than twice as many as are based in Sweden.
To the extent that Spotify influences the broader political and social climate at all, it's just a really efficient delivery mechanism for Anglophone (chiefly the US, Canada and the UK to a lesser extent) culture, which incidentally happened to have been founded in Sweden. It is not chiefly (and never has been) a delivery mechanism for Swedish culture, or non-Anglo European culture.
This is a classic Motte and Bailey. In the original post, wokeness was described as an "American cultural export", or that it was "imported wholesale". Now it's drawn down to "many components of wokeness originated in the US", which I wouldn't disagree with. Looking at the wiki pages for many woke topics like radical feminism will indeed show many Americans, but it will also show people like Julie Bindel, Monique Wittig, and Germaine Greer. Again, almost all of critical theory traces its roots to the Frankfurt School and people like Foucalt. I'm not countering by saying that wokeness is uniquely European, rather I'm saying its a joint venture between both sides of the Atlantic. For a more nuanced take, I'd say that the general groundwork skews German, while the modern implementation of wokeness skews to the Anglosphere. Fundamentally, it's just wrong to describe wokeness as uniquely American, or even disproportionately American when accounting for population levels and scholarly output.
I wasn't using Spotify as a genuine example, I was using it to show "correlation doesn't imply causation", specific to examples you used like Pfizer somehow being a critical component of wokeness advancing in Europe.
Well, you absolutely agreed with me that BLM is as American as apple pie, and has no European antecedents. Likewise the term "intersectionality", coined by an American academic. I do think most of modern gender ideology can be traced directly to Judith Butler. When I talk about wokeness in Ireland, I'm primarily talking about BLM, the concept of white privilege, gender ideology, and the nomenclature associated with the ideology. I think it's reasonable to say that, to the extent that wokeness has caught on in Ireland, concepts and paradigms which were invented in the US have had an outsized influence. Maybe it was hyperbolic to say that wokeness was "imported wholesale" from the US, but not extremely so.
Sure, but wokeness didn't actually catch on in Ireland during the lifetime of Foucault or members of the Frankfurt school - it caught on in 2013-4. Maybe American critical theorists were just rephrasing concepts which originated with the Frankfurt school, but I still think they deserve a significant amount of credit for translating it in a way that made it palatable to a young and international audience. Elvis Presley may have been heavily inspired by Chuck Berry, but that doesn't change the fact that it was Elvis who became the King of rock n roll.
That is to say, non-Americans may have significantly contributed to woke ideology, but I think the specific flavour of woke ideology which caught on in Ireland retains a specifically American flavour, even in cases where this makes no obvious sense. Woke people are pretty good at adapting the overarching tenets of the ideology to local parochial concerns (e.g. land acknowledgements for aboriginals in Oz and NZ) but that really hasn't happened here: Irish progressives get far more bent out of shape about alleged racist incidents against Ireland's vanishingly small black population than they do about discrimination against Irish Travellers.
I think Julie Bindel and Germaine Greer are uniquely bad examples to illustrate how non-Americans contributed to the rise of wokeness, given that woke people despise these two women for their TERF opinions. In fact, Greer was enormously popular with the second wave of feminists in Ireland and the UK in the 1980s: the rise of wokeness caused a steep decline in her popularity to the point that she's effectively persona non grata in many British universities. Bindel writes for Unherd, for Christ's sake.
True, I can only prove that the cultural dominance of wokeness coincided with the rise of social media, I can't prove a causation. But I do think that social media played a significant role in disseminating and popularizing woke paradigms and concepts. I don't think it's a coincidence that Facebook was originally only accessible on American college campuses, quickly became the biggest social media platform in the world, and shortly afterwards an ideology which was invented (or refined, or perfected, whatever) on American college campuses became culturally dominant in the Anglophone world.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link