This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This Wikipedia article has not only amused me greatly, but provided hope, something that I didn't think a Wikipedia article could ever do. I thought we had reached a point where saying "trans women are men" was socially equivalent to using a racial slur, a signal that you oppose trans rights and/or hate trans people outright. Now, there is a popular meme that plays on the fact that trans women are men, while acknowledging that it's okay for them to live in a way that's consistent with who they want to be.
I think that's what's happening.
See, I mainly know the word "bussy" in the context of discussing hypothetical sex with trans women, but that's because of the kind of people I talk to and the kinds of things I read. Is this use of the word an outlier? Is it mostly used to refer to homosexual cis men (which makes the joke much less funny)? Would a lefty who uses the term to refer to cis mens' anuses be offended if I used it to talk about trans women's anuses?
I believe the word signifies a slightly more significant cultural shift than others might suggest. It's a joke, but it's a joke that trans people sometimes use. This indicates that some individuals are becoming more relaxed about the nuances in their sexuality. While this won't necessarily lead to trans people giving up, for instance, the fight to be included in sports, it's likely a sign that language norms are becoming less strict, more playful, and less serious.
Of course, this is downstream of cultural victories on the trans side. They become more secure as queer sexuality becomes more normalized and positively coded.
..If I didn't know better, I'd say this means that to the key to defeating wokeness and returning to the culture of 2003 is actually to let wokeness win.
I'm wouldn't go that far. I mean, it would end this culture war, but the pendulum would end up with leftist censorship for a while before people chilled out. And you'd end up with trans women in sports.
I think this is somewhat cyclical too. The culture war will wind up again eventually, on another topic.
If 2003 culture norms are what you want, then you have to fight for 2003 culture norms.
If you're ok with trans people existing, but want things to be chill again, then you have it a bit easier, because you can compromise on their behavior being ok but wanting your language to be uncensored.
Either way though. Things have gotten very spicy. It's hard to prove that you want peace while holding tools others have used as weapons. That's why it's 'bussy' and not 'manhole' or something. And it's a lot easier to maintain a compromise with a small group of friends who have already chilled out about it a bit than to end the culture war when so many people still feel so much more strongly about it on both sides.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link