site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of May 29, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

6
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A stirring speech, but the paean to martial honour that it is built around has always been the minority view among those who fought and bled in industrial-age warfare. The politics of Reconstruction-era America, like the politics of inter-war Europe, was defined by never again. So, in a more uplifting way, was the politics of post-WW2 Europe. War is the price we pay to preserve peace, not something valuable in its own right. This view, too, is in the old books, because things change less than you think. I think it is most eloquently put by John Adams in a letter to his wife:

The science of government it is my duty to study, more than all other sciences; the arts of legislation and administration and negotiation ought to take the place of, indeed exclude, in a manner, all other arts. I must study politics and war, that our sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy. Our sons ought to study mathematics and philosophy, geography, natural history and naval architecture, navigation, commerce and agriculture in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary, tapestry and porcelain.

The virtues of American (and before it, British) commercial culture are deep and wide - and, incidentally, unmatched on the battlefield. They should be celebrated for what they are, not compared unfavourably to the martial virtues that we appear to have given up for them. And we remember those who died to preserve them for what they gave up, not what they represent.

If the dead of Gettysburg could talk, would they agree with OWH or John Adams? Mass literacy continued to advance over the intervening decades, and the dead of Flanders speak to us through their letters. Famously, they agree with the living of their generation - war is hell, and war on that scale should only be fought to end all wars.

We men of the factories and counting-houses are not without honour (serial bankrupt Donald Trump excepted). "Dictum Meum Pactum" - "My word is my bond" - the motto of the London Stock Exchange. "The full faith and credit of the United States Government". These mean something (although unfortunately less than they would have done to John Quincy Adams), and people sleep more soundly at night knowing that they will not be ruined because of them. What are Mensur scars or the broken necks of the polo ground which OWH so admires when compared to the skills and spills of modern football (Association or gridiron) - whether you compare the quality of the spectacle at the top of the sport or the ratio of characters built to bodies maimed at the grassroots. Mathematics and philosophy, geography, natural history and naval architecture, navigation, commerce and agriculture are advanced wonderously.

And perhaps we should be more gracious if our granddaughters want to waste some of their time on painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary, tapestry and porcelain. Rome, after all, is remembered as much for her achievements in those areas as for her battlefield victories.

I have always seen war as a very necessary evil. We shouldn’t seek it, but at the same time, there’s always barbarians at the gates, and peace is more often than not followed by those barbarians thirsting for the blood of a people who removed the cannons in favor of flower pots, who’d beaten their swords into plows and didn’t teach their kids to fight.

War is certainly hell, but I think the slavery bought by refusing to fight is just as bad. Watching your country ravaged and looted is bad, as is the hunger that follows. What concerns me hear is that Ukraine and (I suspect) Taiwan are the first of several wars that will result from the end of Pax Americana just as centuries of warfare followed the end of Pax Romana. Porcelain is great, but I think because we’re in the heart of the Atlanticist Empire, and don’t see the problems, that we assume we’re immune from nature’s law of tooth and fang. You cannot be weak.